Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-19 Thread pouar
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:53:06 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 17:43 -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > the soname the reverse deps link to doesn't seemed to have changed as > > they all link to the .so.1 soname, but I'm not sure how to check for > > "weirdness" in these package

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread mcatanzaro
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: This is the most common convention, but it's not invariably true. (Some upstreams *intentionally* do not follow this versioning convention for their sonames, note). What the package dependencies ultimately go by is the soname embedded in

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 17:43 -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > the soname the reverse deps link to doesn't seemed to have changed as they > all link to the .so.1 soname, but I'm not sure how to check for "weirdness" > in these packages From what you've posted I don't think there's any problem, basica

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread pouar
the soname the reverse deps link to doesn't seemed to have changed as they all link to the .so.1 soname, but I'm not sure how to check for "weirdness" in these packages -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matri

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 17:14 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:45 PM, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > Well the minor version and the soname of the library itself changed > > but the > > major version and the sonames of the symlinks pointing to the library > > remained the sa

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread mcatanzaro
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:45 PM, po...@pouar.net wrote: Well the minor version and the soname of the library itself changed but the major version and the sonames of the symlinks pointing to the library remained the same. The first digit in the soname is what matters. E.g. I have on my machine

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread pouar
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:06:57 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > You can use rpmsodiff and the tools in libabigail package to check the ABI > and API differences. > > Regards, > Dominik I was using this https://github.com/lvc/abi-compliance-checker -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/p

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 at 22:45, po...@pouar.net wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:28:48 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 06:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:42PM -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > > > So is someone els

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread pouar
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:28:48 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 06:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:42PM -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > > So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse > > > dependencies > > > w

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 06:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:42PM -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse dependencies > > work with the new version or do I have to do that? > > *Somebody* has to do it

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:42PM -0500, po...@pouar.net wrote: > So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse dependencies > work with the new version or do I have to do that? *Somebody* has to do it. If *you* can at least start doing that, that would be great and will probably

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-17 Thread pouar
So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse dependencies work with the new version or do I have to do that? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 00:48 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Saturday, 14 April 2018 at 03:30, po...@pouar.net wrote: > > golang-github-dsnet-compress > > httpd > > php-pecl-http > > python-httpbin > > webkit2gtk3 > > woff2 > > > > > > So I just announce that I'm updating the pac

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-15 Thread pouar
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:48:23 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Have you rebuilt all dependent packages successfully beforehand? > If not, and there are API and/or ABI changes that require porting > to the new API, you'll be creating unexpected work for the maintainers > of the above p

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 14 April 2018 at 03:30, po...@pouar.net wrote: > I'm supposed to notify you a week in advanced, which for me puts it > at 2018-04-21. the following packages will need to be rebuilt once that > happens. > > golang-github-dsnet-compress > httpd > php-pecl-http > python-httpbin > webkit2

plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

2018-04-13 Thread pouar
I'm supposed to notify you a week in advanced, which for me puts it at 2018-04-21. the following packages will need to be rebuilt once that happens. golang-github-dsnet-compress httpd php-pecl-http python-httpbin webkit2gtk3 woff2 So I just announce that I'm updating the package on the day I upd