Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-02-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/07/2011 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] : >> >> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to >> achieve much in practice. > > I have to admit this is my conclusion as well. > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> >

Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-02-07 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] : > > I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to > achieve much in practice. I have to admit this is my conclusion as well. > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths

perl INC

2010-07-30 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
%{_prefix}/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 -%define old_vendorarch %{_libdir}/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/%{perl_archname} -# for a reason that is not clear, the version component got stripped here: -%define old_vendorlib %{_prefix}/lib/perl5/vendor_perl -# No need to add old privdir and archdir to o