Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:11:20PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 07/13/2010 10:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > >> On 07/08/2010 10:13 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > >>> BTW: We are talking about 4 packages, involving these 3 maintainers

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/13/2010 10:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> On 07/08/2010 10:13 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >>> BTW: We are talking about 4 packages, involving these 3 maintainers: perl-DBI-Dumper: Chris Weyl perl-Data-Alias: Chris W

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/13/2010 10:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 07/08/2010 10:13 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> BTW: We are talking about 4 packages, involving these 3 maintainers: >>> >>> perl-DBI-Dumper: Chris Weyl >>> perl-Data-Alias: Chris Weyl >>> perl-Pugs-Compiler: Steven Pritchard. >>> perl-Test-Aut

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-08 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 07/08/2010 06:48 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > b) Or simply apply > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife > > FTBS/rel-eng will certainly apply b), and I don't see much reasons for > not applying b) either. > > > I'm for b/ too. If rel-eng won't be happy, he can al

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/08/2010 05:05 AM, Iain Arnell wrote: > 2010/7/7 Ralf Corsepius: >> On 07/07/2010 03:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >>> After I gained so much popularity on fedora-devel, I have no courage to >>> ask rel-eng for another >>> favour like "remove package, which is not mine". But surely ping >>>

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-07 Thread Iain Arnell
2010/7/7 Ralf Corsepius : > On 07/07/2010 03:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> After I gained so much popularity on fedora-devel, I have no courage to >> ask rel-eng for another >> favour like "remove package, which is not mine". But surely ping >> maintainers >> to orphan/kill these packages in w

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/07/2010 09:37 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 07/03/2010 08:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> An update: >> >> I filed BZ's on all of those packages which haven't not already been >> tracked as FTBS. All of these BZs are tagged as "F14Target" rsp. >> F14FTBFS (which indirectly blocks "F14Targ

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-07 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 07/03/2010 08:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > An update: > > I filed BZ's on all of those packages which haven't not already been > tracked as FTBS. All of these BZs are tagged as "F14Target" rsp. > F14FTBFS (which indirectly blocks "F14Target"). > Thank for filing these bugzillas. Perl 5.1

rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-06-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, AFAICT, these packages remain to be looked after * BackupPC-3.1.0-14 wants perl-suidperl (Abandoned by perl-5.12.) * gnumeric-plugins-extras-1.10.0-1 Fails to build for reasons outside of Perl. * perl-DBI-Dumper Fails to build - Dead upstream. * perl-Data-Alias Fails to build - Dead upstre

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-31 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 05/28/2010 03:19 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > 2010/5/12 Marcela Mašláňová : >> >> Today list of packages is little shorter (114): > > Did you only rebuild perl-* packages? Checking whatrequires > 'perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.?)' gives me 164 distinct src packages in > dist-f14-perltest (out of 1570 in

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-18 Thread Chris Weyl
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > Only three perl-Catalyst-* are still failing: > >> perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex BindLex can probably go away at some point... It mainly exists for legacy purposes, with big "DON'T USE THIS, IT'S VERY VERY BROKEN-ISH" warnings. There sho

Re: perl 5.12 status - dependency graph - 20100514

2010-05-14 Thread Marcela Maslanova
- "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: > On 05/14/2010 04:08 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on > 2010-05-14. > > > Comments on some packages I had a look into interspersed: > > > perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper > rebuilt > > > perl-AutoClass > false ne

perl 5.12 status - dependency graph - 20100514

2010-05-14 Thread Petr Pisar
This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on 2010-05-14. -- Petr perl-Acme-PlayCode perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper perl-Archive-RPM perl-AutoClass perl-Business-ISBN-Data perl-Calendar-Simple perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex perl-Catalyst-View-JSON perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits per

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > Hello, > I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still > fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures. > perl-Apache2-SOAP FWIW: this package fails due to a dependency on mod_perl. When having rebuilt mod_perl, perl-Apache2-SOAP

perl 5.12 status - dependency graph

2010-05-12 Thread Petr Pisar
Hello, I've computed dependency graph of failed packages (based on the 113-item list sent by Marcela on Wednesday. See attached compressed SVG file. The graph is layed out in such way that Required packages are below, arrow shows what package depends on that package. Thus I recommend to start wit

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > Hello, > I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still > fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures. > perl-FreezeThaw ... builds after having upgraded it (package is in rawhide, but not in perl-f14-perltest, yet). > perl-Gnom

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-11 Thread Marcela Maslanova
Hello, I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures. perl-Acme-PlayCode perl-Apache2-SOAP perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper perl-Archive-RPM perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope perl-Calendar-Simple perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView perl-Catalyst-Authenti