Re: package reviews for Pandoc and CVE-2023-35936

2024-02-26 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
Hmm it looks like I really do need to update everything to LTS 22 to achieve the pandoc rebase properly (since it needs newer Haskell tls). Here's one more package review: toml-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266093 needed by the typst library. Jens -- ___

Re: package reviews for Pandoc and CVE-2023-35936

2024-02-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:22 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Another day, another needed package (this would also be part of the postponed > Stackage LTS 22 change): > I forgot that pandoc > 3.1.3 had moved to the new crypton stack that replaces > cryptonite: > > crypton: https://bugzilla.redh

Re: package reviews for Pandoc and CVE-2023-35936

2024-02-26 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
Another day, another needed package (this would also be part of the postponed Stackage LTS 22 change): I forgot that pandoc > 3.1.3 had moved to the new crypton stack that replaces cryptonite: crypton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044 Next would be crypton-x509... Is it better

WAS: package reviews for Pandoc and CVE-2023-35936

2024-02-23 Thread Philip Rhoades via devel
People, While we are on this topic - are there any Pandoc gurus here? - I posted a note on the Pandoc site but haven't had any responses yet . . Thanks, Phil. On 2024-02-23 19:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: (changed the subject) On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:14 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

package reviews for Pandoc and CVE-2023-35936

2024-02-23 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
(changed the subject) On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:14 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:06:22PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I realised a second open package review is > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068718 (isocline) >