On 12/30/2017 09:44 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Till.
>
> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote:
> [...]
>> So, I'm wondering:
>> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not
>> provide a bear binary package? To me, this seems r
Hi, Till.
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote:
[...]
> So, I'm wondering:
> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not
> provide a bear binary package? To me, this seems risky and confusing,
> but it would solve the issue.
> 2. If not, would it m
Hi all,
I'm preparing Bear [1] as a Fedora package. Unfortunately, the package
name bear is already taken by the bear engine [2], so I'm considering
the best way to resolve this. Ubuntu [3], Debian [4], Arch (AUR) [5],
and Mint [6] all package the compilation database (i.e., the package I'm
workin
