Thanks a lot for these replies!
Jos
On 2/29/24 12:01, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 19:19 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35:
V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a):
Dear all,
while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes ve
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 19:19 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35:
> > V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a):
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes version 2.34.1 I
> > > ran in to an
> > > issue that is puz
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> I believe those need to be tied into a couple of other questions
> 1. How does any organization work with these various prominent vendors?
I doubt that this is a very useful question as stated. Even
near-peers like Red Hat itself and Ubuntu are probably corporate
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 17:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:24:22AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > What I'm asking is whether Fedora, as an organization, is interested
> > in working with prominent vendors to determine whether there are
> > barriers to publishing software f
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 13:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 11/4/21 17:23, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but
> > on the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position to ask someone
> > at Slack about that decision? And whether there's a
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:24:22AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> What I'm asking is whether Fedora, as an organization, is interested
> in working with prominent vendors to determine whether there are
> barriers to publishing software for Fedora, or whether they perceive
> insufficient value in do
On 11/4/21 17:23, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but
on the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position to ask someone
at Slack about that decision? And whether there's anything that
Fedora can do to make publishing that package more
On 05/11/2021 07:04, Joe Doss wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion but I prefer the official client for work.
You can also use the official Web version in any modern web browser
(Firefox or Chromium).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 05/11/2021 01:23, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but on
the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position to ask someone at
Slack about that decision? And whether there's anything that Fedora can
do to make publishing that package mo
On 11/5/21 12:41 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
The Mattermost client is open source and will connect to Slack. There
are a number of packages in copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fulltext/?fulltext=mattermost
Thanks for the suggestion but I prefer the official client for work.
Joe
--
The Mattermost client is open source and will connect to Slack. There
are a number of packages in copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fulltext/?fulltext=mattermost
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 11/4/21 8:55 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
It would be cool if we could rally some sort of support on our end to
help Slack produce a functioning RPM.
I hit up some buds that used to work at Slack to see if they can help
connect us with some folks there to work this out.
Joe
--
Joe Doss
j...@sol
On 11/4/21 7:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but on
the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position to ask someone at
Slack about that decision? And whether there's anything that Fedora can
do to make publishing that package mor
as root
dnf install dpkg
dpkg --force-depends -i slack-desktop-4.21.1-amd64.deb
desktop-file-install ./usr/share/applications/slack.desktop
works for me ,
is a "standalone" package we can check with :
dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile slack-desktop-4.21.1-amd64.deb | tar tf -
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 2
As someone who has to use Slack for work, this is disappointing, but
at least there is still a flatpak for Slack:
https://www.flathub.org/apps/details/com.slack.Slack
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:24 PM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
>
> https://slack.com/help/articles/115002037526-System-requirements-for-usi
I believe the flatpak on flathub is built on Ubuntu, so there's that, but yes,
this is odd and potentially unfortunate.
\--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
\
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
\-d. bowie
Sent f
https://slack.com/help/articles/115002037526-System-requirements-for-using-Slack
"Note: Starting March 1, 2022, Slack will no longer support Fedora Linux
distributions."
I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but on
the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:32:09 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
Thanks for your insight.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:09:35PM -0700, stan wrote:
> > https://container-solutions.com/dynamic-management-real-ops-disruptor/
> What strikes me about this is that containers sound like static linking
> on steroids.
That's not entirely unfair. The important thing though is that these
particular
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:55:50 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> https://container-solutions.com/dynamic-management-real-ops-disruptor/
What strikes me about this is that containers sound like static linking
on steroids. This seems like it would create a lot of redundancy on a
standalone system. Whe
I know that a lot of us in the Fedora world are from traditional IT
backgrounds. From this point of view, can containers seem like just the
latest buzzword in a long series of fads, and not really all that
different from virtualization or various system-partitioning schemes of
days past.
This is a
Hello,
Researchers at Oregon State University are striving to conduct
research to learn more about the free/open source software community
landscape as it relates to older adults. We’re looking for older
adults who are older than 50 and are currently involved with a
free/open source software proje
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
> This is off topic, but important to open software developers & supporters
>
Yes - this is definitely off-topic. Please do not continue this thread.
Thank You.
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
This is off topic, but important to open software developers & supporters
Brazil may be punished because government supports free software...
IIPA is willing to put Brazil in the black list of copyrights because
Federal & State governments support free software. According to IIPA, by
su
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:28:53 -0500, Orcan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:26:59 -0500, Orcan wrote:
> >
> >> Another annoying issue is updates with no explanations. There is a
> >> "Notes" field in bodhi that many people just ignore for
25 matches
Mail list logo
