gt; >licensed under GPL). I guess ntpstat should rather have its own
> >package.
> Since you are thinking of rewriting, it would make sense to offer it to
> upstream. Do you think they'd take it?
That's a good point. I'll ask them. I think they wouldn't be
intere
to simply drop ntpstat from ntp with no replacement.
Thoughts?
I'd simply remove it. Otherwise you have to act as upstream for this
outdated thing.
Whatever "outdated" means in this context, if it's functional (or can be
made functional) and provides actual utility then wh
On 02/12/2016 06:10 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
ntpstat is a small utility included in the ntp package, which prints
the synchronization status of ntpd, the maximum error of the clock and
few other fields. Apparently, there are people who find it useful for
monitoring.
It has been included in
ommend or suggest. Would that make sense? Another option
> > is to simply drop ntpstat from ntp with no replacement.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> I'd simply remove it. Otherwise you have to act as upstream for this
> outdated thing.
FWIW, I'd have no problem with mai
2016-02-12 12:10 GMT+01:00 Miroslav Lichvar :
> I could write a new man page and put it in the ntp package as a
> replacement. Or it could be added as a new package in Fedora, which
> ntp could recommend or suggest. Would that make sense? Another option
> is to simply drop ntpstat f
ntpstat is a small utility included in the ntp package, which prints
the synchronization status of ntpd, the maximum error of the clock and
few other fields. Apparently, there are people who find it useful for
monitoring.
It has been included in the ntp package for a very long time, but it'
