Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)

2010-09-13 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 11.09.2010 20:53, Julian Sikorski pisze: > Dear all, > > I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs > again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has > been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the > updates myself on

non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)

2010-09-11 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear all, I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3].In the bug report, all responses we

non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)

2010-09-11 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear all, I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3]. In the bug report, all responses w

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-28 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 09.04.2010 11:42, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: > Hi, > >> Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number >> of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect >> breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? > > Twisted in general is really go

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-09 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 09.04.2010 11:42, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: > Hi, > >> Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number >> of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect >> breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? > > Twisted in general is really go

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-09 Thread Thomas Vander Stichele
Hi, > Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number > of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect > breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do deprecate stuff. When they do s

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-07 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 06.04.2010 15:56, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: > > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking > >> about python-tw

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-06 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > buildbot-0:0.7.12-1.fc12.noarch I maintain this one; it has a fairly decent set of tests so I should be able to catch any issue at build time. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-06 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number > of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect > breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? > I think we could start by dividing

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:56 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since > I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla Have you considered using an IRC bouncer? I set up Bip (http://bip.t1r.net/ ) a few mont

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-06 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 06.04.2010 15:56, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking >> about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by >> a similar bug [2

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-06 Thread Thomas Vander Stichele
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Dear all, > > it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking > about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by > a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th > of M

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-05 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: >> I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I >> filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. >> >> Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is t

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-04 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: > I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I > filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. > > Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. > > Felix Maybe Thomas is still active as a moritur

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-03 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: > I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I > filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. > > Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. > > Felix I tried a couple of times, but we seem to

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-03 Thread Felix Kaechele
I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

2010-04-03 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear all, it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the non-