Thank you. Will check out the logs and the bug report.
--
Bojan
-Original Message-
From: Petr Pisar
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Cc: Bojan Smojver
Subject: Re: Rawhide: noarch package built differently on different
architectures
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:44:52 +0200
V Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 06:40:48PM +1000, Bojan Smojver via devel napsal(a):
> Example:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76099482
>
> Built the same thing on F35/34/33 and EPEL8/7 and that worked. Did
> something change in Rawhide that I should be aware of or is this just a
Example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76099482
Built the same thing on F35/34/33 and EPEL8/7 and that worked. Did
something change in Rawhide that I should be aware of or is this just a
temporary thing?
Thanks,
--
Bojan
___
deve
down to one:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49373300
49373300 build (rawhide, zipios-2.2.5.0-1.fc34.src.rpm): open (
buildvm-ppc64le-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
zipios-doc-2.2.5.0-1.fc34.no
> On 02/02/18 13:01, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> Yes I'm pretty sure that is
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537522 which affects
> anything that builds documentation with doxygen because graphviz crashes
> on i686 so the graphs never get created and hence are missing from the
> files.
On 02/02/18 13:01, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:43:10 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
Hi,
when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on
koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]:
BuildError: The following noarch pac
> The issue appears to be in documentation. Isn't there some timestamp or
> something like that?
>
>
> V.
>
>
> Dne 2.2.2018 v 13:43 Martin Gansser napsal(a):
Hi Vit,
what does you mean with timestamp ?
[martin@f27 libmicrohttpd-0.9.59]$ grep -r timestamp doc/*
___
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:43:10 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on
> koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]:
>
> BuildError: The following noarch package buil
error message [1]:
>
> BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
> architectures: libmicrohttpd-doc-0.9.59-1.fc28.noarch.rpm
> rpmdiff output was:
> error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Permission denied (13)
> error: cannot open Packages datab
Hi,
when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on koji, the
package build fails with the following error message [1]:
BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
architectures: libmicrohttpd-doc-0.9.59-1.fc28.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:24:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> OK, maybe you're talking about having %{_isa} in the spec file, ie:
>
> %package doc
> ...
> BuildArch: noarch
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> ? That would make the dependency include "(x86-64)" (or
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:09:24 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:33:52 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> >
> > > I guess noarch packages shouldn't have any arch-specific dependencies.
> > > Is that correct?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:09:24AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:33:52 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> >
> > > I guess noarch packages shouldn't have any arch-specific dependencies.
> > > Is that correct?
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:33:52 -0500, David Muse wrote:
>
> > I guess noarch packages shouldn't have any arch-specific dependencies.
> > Is that correct?
>
> Yes.
Umm really? Can you explain exactly what's wrong with this?
I th
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:33:52 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> I guess noarch packages shouldn't have any arch-specific dependencies.
> Is that correct?
Yes.
Noarch packages may be built on any machine of any arch, they may be
copied to any repository for any arch, and they are supposed to be usable
w
On 12/25/2016 6:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:06:03 -0500, David Muse wrote:
Oh, I just realized that there's an rpmdiff tool.
Mentioned in your original mail. ;-)
Well, I tried that,
and the only difference it shows is the timestamp for each file, which I
would expe
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:06:03 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> Oh, I just realized that there's an rpmdiff tool.
Mentioned in your original mail. ;-)
> Well, I tried that,
> and the only difference it shows is the timestamp for each file, which I
> would expect to be different. An rpmdiff -iT of the
): open
(arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
rudiments-doc-1.0.1-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was:
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Permission denied (13)
error: cannot open Packa
) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
rudiments-doc-1.0.1-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was:
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Permission denied (13)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: cannot o
rch package built differently on different architectures:
rudiments-doc-1.0.1-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was:
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Permission denied (13)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
...when do
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:32:41 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently started getting errors like:
>
> 17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
> (arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
> following noarch pack
Hello,
I recently started getting errors like:
17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
(arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
rudiments-doc-1.0.1-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
rpmd
22 matches
Mail list logo
