Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-02-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alan Pevec (ape...@gmail.com) said: > Bill, that was added by you in commit "Rearrange to match RHEL 6 groups." > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=comps.git;a=commit;h=25629d715dc2416b3a83195c6099828a0cfac0cf > what was the idea with those groups, I don't see them as sub-channels > in RHN, e

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-02-07 Thread Alan Pevec
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense. Oops, just found there's already "Virtualization Client" in comps-el6.xml - but it's empty: Group: Virtualizat

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-02-06 Thread Alan Pevec
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense. >> I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of >> packages are not exclusive. > > Got a patch for this? v2 attached, it renames just name,

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-02-03 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alan Pevec (ape...@gmail.com) said: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which > > is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization > > host. Admittedly this does include some deskto

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-01-23 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alan Pevec (ape...@gmail.com) said: > Since comps groups can't be extended, flow is to choose Minimal on the > initial Anaconda screen, then Customize Now: > * http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/virtmin1.png > In the next step, under Base System category, new "Virtualization > Host" group is choosen.

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-01-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:18:17PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:09:45PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to add a new group in comps.xml to make it easier to install > > minimal hypervisor based on Fedora. > > It would include only basic virtua

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-01-23 Thread Alan Pevec
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which > is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization > host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too. Right, I forgot to mention why exi

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-01-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:09:45PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to add a new group in comps.xml to make it easier to install > minimal hypervisor based on Fedora. > It would include only basic virtualization software (libvirt and > qemu-kvm) and it would serve as a base to insta

new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-01-23 Thread Alan Pevec
Hi all, I'd like to add a new group in comps.xml to make it easier to install minimal hypervisor based on Fedora. It would include only basic virtualization software (libvirt and qemu-kvm) and it would serve as a base to install virtualization management stack on top of it. Initial use-cases are: