Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/28/2015 09:10 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:33 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >>> My concern is that there's probably a lot of 3rd party apps that use >>> gnutls. Even if it's just as simple as rebuilding, i

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-28 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/28/2015 12:04 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > In this case, however, I think it makes sense to not do a full parallel > installation, but just enough to preserve the ABI compatibility and > exclude headers and anything else that could be used to link against it. > This makes sure that anything newl

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-28 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/28/2015 09:10 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:33 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> My concern is that there's probably a lot of 3rd party apps that use >> gnutls. Even if it's just as simple as rebuilding, it probably takes a >> while for them to switch over. >> I th

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-28 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:33 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/27/2015 03:56 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > Hello, > > Next week I plan to update nettle to 3.1.1 and gnutls to 3.4.0 in > > rawhide. That would require a recompilation of the packages that depend > > on them. Any objections?

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-27 Thread Florian Weimer
On 04/27/2015 04:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 27 April 2015 at 15:33, Kalev Lember wrote: >> I think it would make sense to keep ABI compatibility with the old >> soname for one Fedora release, just to give 3rd parties time to >> transition over. I could help making an ABI compat package for

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 April 2015 at 15:33, Kalev Lember wrote: > I think it would make sense to keep ABI compatibility with the old > soname for one Fedora release, just to give 3rd parties time to > transition over. I could help making an ABI compat package for this if > you agree it makes sense? From my point

Re: nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-27 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/27/2015 03:56 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: Hello, Next week I plan to update nettle to 3.1.1 and gnutls to 3.4.0 in rawhide. That would require a recompilation of the packages that depend on them. Any objections? My concern is that there's probably a lot of 3rd party apps that use

nettle, gnutls: soname version bump in rawhide

2015-04-27 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Hello, Next week I plan to update nettle to 3.1.1 and gnutls to 3.4.0 in rawhide. That would require a recompilation of the packages that depend on them. Any objections? regards, Nikos -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fe