On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:48 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote
> So I'd like to submit a new "msp430mcu" package for review.
I've now submitted this for review. Thanks for the feedback everyone.
It'd be great if someone could find the time to review it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478
Rob Spanton wrote:
> rpmlint doesn't seem to be very happy about me shipping this rpm that
> contains a lot of headers. So unhappy that it tells me 454 times about
> it ;-)
Compiler toolchains are exempt from the -devel package requirement, as are
target libraries for cross-compilation (see e.g.
On 05/18/2012 09:48 AM, Rob Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain
up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump
forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works.
Excellent, thanks! are you also doing msp430-bi
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Rob Spanton wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
> So I'd like to submit a new "msp430mcu" package for review. This
> package would almost entirely consist of headers and linker scripts.
> Since this package would be essential for cross-compiling *anything* for
> the msp430,
Hi,
I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain
up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump
forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works.
There's a C library for the msp430 micro-controllers called msp430-libc.
This used to contain
