I don't have a strong opinion, so I would start with restricted ACLs and expand
if needed: site admins(releng, infra) + main admin.
2019(e)ko abenduaren 9(a) 15:07:07 (CET)-(e)an, Pierre-Yves Chibon
-(e)k hau idatzi zuen:
>On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 08:46:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Mon, De
Am 09.12.19 um 18:34 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
Thinking some more about this and while I think we should aim for this process,
considering the gain we would have from just moving away from
fedora-scm-requests (nicer UX, easier sync to bugzilla of the information, no
need to clone that large g
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 06:34:15PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > It would be nice if we would implement "approval" system while doing
> > > this. Like if
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > It would be nice if we would implement "approval" system while doing
> > this. Like if you set somebody as override, that person must click
> > "accept". Same way
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> It would be nice if we would implement "approval" system while doing
> this. Like if you set somebody as override, that person must click
> "accept". Same way to change it, the old person must click "accept".
I'm trying to think how
It would be nice if we would implement "approval" system while doing
this. Like if you set somebody as override, that person must click
"accept". Same way to change it, the old person must click "accept".
Of course, pagure admin should be able to override this, based on
FESCo tickets and such.
On
> We are thinking on providing a simple text field to submit FAS username or
> email to override the default assignee, the big question is then, who should
> be allowed to update this field ?
I like it's the same policy with editing the Setting page of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/foo .
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 08:46:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:39 AM Karsten Hopp wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are currently working on getting rid of the git repo at
> > fedora-scm-requests [1] which is nowadays only used to store the overrides
> > of the default assign
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:39 AM Karsten Hopp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are currently working on getting rid of the git repo at
> fedora-scm-requests [1] which is nowadays only used to store the overrides of
> the default assignee in bugzilla (for example to allow different default
> assignee for Fed
Hi,
We are currently working on getting rid of the git repo at
fedora-scm-requests [1] which is nowadays only used to store the
overrides of the default assignee in bugzilla (for example to allow
different default assignee for Fedora and EPEL).
I am working on porting this mechanism to dist-
10 matches
Mail list logo
