On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> Quoting Neal Becker (2013-12-18 14:06:23)
>> During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
>> bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost
>> libs.
>>
>> On updating to f20,
Ah! http://dev.laptop.org/git/packages/
cheers,
m
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Hey thanks! But did you forget to include a link to the git repos?
>
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Neal,
>>
>> look like you've found the one thing fedora devel has consensus on ;-)
>>
>>
Hey thanks! But did you forget to include a link to the git repos?
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Neal,
>
> look like you've found the one thing fedora devel has consensus on ;-)
>
> Here is a series of git repos that show how I was maintaining some
> rpms outside of the fedora infra, but using fedp
Neal,
look like you've found the one thing fedora devel has consensus on ;-)
Here is a series of git repos that show how I was maintaining some
rpms outside of the fedora infra, but using fedpkg (which I recommend)
-- more specifically mockbuild.
These repos are public, but you can do the same i
Neal Becker wrote:
> How do others solve this problem
package your software as rpms too, so such dependencies get tracked.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-
Quoting Neal Becker (2013-12-18 14:06:23)
> During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
> bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost libs.
>
> On updating to f20, all of my software became broken, because the library
> versions it w
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> 2) somehow build against f20 libs on an f19 system?
this is trivially done using mock. Actually, what I do, even for
non-public builds, is to have a spec file in a git repository and
build/rebuild the rpm using fedpkg.
fedpkg makes things inc
On 18/12/13 13:19, Neal Becker wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost
libs.
Is your software packaged in Fed
Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
>> bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost
>> libs.
>
> Is your software packaged in Fedora?
No, this is not intend
On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost libs.
Is your software packaged in Fedora?
How do others solve this problem, or can anyone think of
During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost libs.
On updating to f20, all of my software became broken, because the library
versions it was linked with were removed.
So I had to race to re
11 matches
Mail list logo
