Hi,
this is follow up to recent discussion we had with Harald Hoyer. Long story
short
there were some packagers who interpreted `Requires(pre)` tag wrongly as it is
not
an extended semantic of normal `Requires` but has rather different meaning [1].
In
some packages rpm ancient `PreReq` dependen
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Honza Šilhan wrote:
> The maintainers of Fedora components containing
> `Requires(pre)` tag and while not having the `Requires` were informed.
BTW the thing that detected the use of Requires(pre) in packages seems
to have been buggy; I got (among other things) a r
On 03/18/2016 01:59 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
BTW the thing that detected the use of Requires(pre) in packages seems
to have been buggy; I got (among other things) a report for netmask
which does not have Requires(pre) at all, it has Requires(post,preun):
/sbin/install-info.
I also received a fal
On Friday, March 18, 2016 2:10:49 PM CDT Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 01:59 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > BTW the thing that detected the use of Requires(pre) in packages seems
> > to have been buggy; I got (among other things) a report for netmask
> > which does not have Requires(pre)
