Hello Everyone!
I just pushed to rawhide an update for lxqt-wallet 4.0 that breaks abi
compatibility with items that use it.
In this case though, the packages depending on it have also been rebuilt
for it. But as it is tradition (And directed in Fedora's rules), I am
posting in the devel ma
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_2.0
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-lxqt-2-0-self-contained/126067
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals
start. I cannot put much
more on my schedule at the moment ;)
However, if the SIG and the related maintainers cannot handle the LXQt
packages at the moment either, it might be worth to discuss removing it
from the promoted Spins list for now, doesn't it? Finally, the issue
here is not
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Christopher Klooz via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after
> updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0,
> which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0.
>
> I
Hi,
I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after
updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0,
which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0.
I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem
to not contain critical
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:39:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == How To Test ==
>
> Install using the ISO or the disk image on aarch64 system. The system
> should work as it should be by manually installing on top of any
> existing aarch64 system.
Does our QA have the necessary resources (hardwar
Committee.
== Summary ==
Generate LXQt image (both iso and disk image) for aarch64 architecture.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt has moved out of 0.x version and is now 1.1.0, so I consider it
to be a pretty stable
Hi,
I plan to merge LXQt 1.1.0 into Rawhide on Monday. This will cause the
follow so-name bumps
%{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11
%{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11.0.0
%{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1
%{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1.1.0
%{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3
%{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3.9.0
%{_libdir}/libQt5XdgIconLoader.so
.
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 1.1.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 1.1.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features
including but not limited to Qt6 integration, appearance changes etc.
It's a
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:44 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>>
>> Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in
>> distgit that bumps the version to 1.0.0, but I can't find an associated
>> build in Koji for that version. I actually thi
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:37 AM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
>> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
>
&
Apparently there were soname bumps in other lxqt packages that were updated
other than just those two. The qtermwidget package appears to have had an
soname bump from libqtermwidget5.so.0 to libqtermwidget5.so.1, breaking at
least TexStudio in Rawhide. I did a build for it, and it has been pushed
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in
distgit tha
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:37:59PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built the
> packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. The following package
> contains library with a soname bump
>
> l
Hi,
I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. The following package
contains library with a soname bump
liblxqt (liblxqt.so.1)
liblxqt-globalkeys (liblxqt-globalkeys.so.1,liblxqt-globalkeys-ui.so.1)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_1.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 1.0.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 1.0.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features. It's
always good to
I've been using LXQT on my rasp3+ since f33 and even forgot
I successfully upgraded to f34 on 03/24/21, but can't find
an f34 image. Is there an image available for f34 and will
one be made available for f35?
Joe
___
devel mailing lis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.16.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 0.16.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep
Fedora
Ok, I’ll fix them.
> 7 авг. 2020 г., в 14:28, Mamoru TASAKA написал(а):
>
> Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07:
>> 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?)
>> 2. they are incompilable now in f33
>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07:
1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?)
2. they are incompilable now in f33 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
> 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?)
> 2. they are incompilable now in f33
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039)
> 3. but lqxt-0.15.0 built ok without them (?)
>
> So, the question is
1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?)
2. they are incompilable now in f33
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
Hi Zamir,
thanks and no problem. I even forgot about this issue.
Regards
Raphael
Am 24.06.20 um 14:47 schrieb Zamir SUN:
On 12/11/18 7:52 AM, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi,
writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members
of lxqt-sig list can read here, too and especially
On 12/11/18 7:52 AM, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi,
writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members of lxqt-sig
list can read here, too and especially @zsun.
Hi Raphael
I'm realy sorry, there are too many emails in devel so when I am not on
cc list it's high cha
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.15.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 0.15.0 or later in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 0.15.0 just released with a bunch of bugfixes and enhancements.
It's a
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.14.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 0.14.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep
Fedora
Hi,
writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members of lxqt-sig
list can read here, too and especially @zsun.
Is there any sense why @lxqt-sig is member of packaging for featherpad? LXQt
SIG decided to have enki in the spin as the default editor. Featherpad is not
part of
On 08/05/2018 12:38 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> awesome! The themes are a seperate point, yes. Please note that libfm-qt
> released a bugfix 0.13.1. In any case, your work is fine so I'll give
> you access to lxqt-sig FAS group, which means you'll have co
Hi,
awesome! The themes are a seperate point, yes. Please note that libfm-qt
released a bugfix 0.13.1. In any case, your work is fine so I'll give
you access to lxqt-sig FAS group, which means you'll have commit access
to the LXQt specific packages.
Greetings,
Christian
On 08/04/201
Hi Christian,
As we talked on IRC yesterday, I build the LxQT 0.13.0 packages in my
copr[1].
All the spec files can be found here[2].
I installed it on top of Fedora Rawhide and did a screenshot[3] to prove
it basically works.
And since this works, I will ask one of the libqtxdg maintainer to
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting.
As I mentioned in this thread[1], I want to get libqtxdg updated in
Fedora. However this will affect LxQT.
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires libqtxdg
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fzug-free', disabling.
Last metadata expiration check: 1:31
irement for lxqt-sig access to LXQt packages). So you need to be
> sponsored as a packager first to be able to build and maintain official
> Fedora packages, check
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>
> But a first step would be playing with LXQ
Hi again :) I don't see you in packager group in FAS (which is a
requirement for lxqt-sig access to LXQt packages). So you need to be
sponsored as a packager first to be able to build and maintain official
Fedora packages, check
https://fedoraproject.org
Yes i am already a packager,i can do this then
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 21:30 Christian Dersch,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages, besides
> that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora wallpaper
> etc.) and finally
Hi,
are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages,
besides that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora
wallpaper etc.) and finally maintaining the live spin. Packaging is the
most important topic.
Greetings,
Christian
On 07/20/2018 04:44 PM, Manas
intel optimized kernel for fedora.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Christian Dersch
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as some of you might have recognized, Fedora's LXQt is quite outdated (we
> have 0.11, current one for some weeks now is 0.13) and also needs some
> rework with respec
Hi all,
as some of you might have recognized, Fedora's LXQt is quite outdated
(we have 0.11, current one for some weeks now is 0.13) and also needs
some rework with respect to theming and the package set (upstream
restructured packaging a bit with respect to common files). When I
joine
I install all mesa drivers for i686 , 64 and omx
the startx command get this error:
xf86EnableIOPorts : failed to set IOPL for I/O ...
maybe is virtualbox problem , but this error is just on lxqt environment .
the lxde and xfce environments works well.
I don't have any idea if this is
Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> I try to install lxqt desktop group environment
> I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora
>
> The error on default user point to xorg error :
>
> xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require
>
> This is strange because the lxde d
I try to install lxqt desktop group environment
I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora
The error on default user point to xorg error :
xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require
This is strange because the lxde desktop environment group running well on
machine.
Maybe is a bug
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:58:35 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote:
> > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet;
> >
> > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su
> > /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1
>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote:
> I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet;
>
> [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su
> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to:
> Non-ASCII characters found
> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts
I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet;
[jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to:
Non-ASCII characters found
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs.bin: line 1 error
due to: Non-ASCII charac
Hi everyone,
I created a blog entry about the current state:
https://lupinix.blogspot.de/2017/01/lxqt-spin-proposed-for-fedora-26-new.html
Greetings,
Christian
On 01/16/2017 02:00 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
LXDE spin will exist until its maintainer will stop it, LXQt is
independent from LXDE spin. So nobody is forced to change ;) Also both
projects are maintained upstream so there is no reason to drop anything
here.
On 01/16/2017 02:54 PM, William Moreno wrote:
This new spin will be coexisting
This new spin will be coexisting with the current lxde spin? Or users of
the lxde spin will need to move to lxqt?
Is the second option is valid there will be a smooth update process via the
dnf system upgrade tool?
El 16/1/2017 7:01 a. m., "Jan Kurik" escribió:
> = Proposed S
= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_Spin
Change owner(s):
* Christian Dersch
A Fedora Spin providing the LXQt desktop environment.
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt is a lightweight Qt-based desktop environment. Fedora provides it
since
in my opinion lacks the two applications is lxqt-admin obconf-qt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:41:01 -
" mastaiza" wrote:
> This is a dead end that no one knows what to do.
I wouldn't say that, I think its just that we couldn't figure out what
your actual issue was or how to direct you.
How did you install lxqt?
It seems the co
Am 24.12.2015 um 00:41 schrieb mastaiza:
This is a dead end that no one knows what to do
what about senseful quoting so that one could know what you are talking
about? a subject "Re: lxqt" implies you are responding to something
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
This is a dead end that no one knows what to do.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This is not a yumex-dnf issue, it works fine in other DE's, Other lxqt
users have had this issue, I don't know what the solution is
Tim
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 at 10:13 mastaiza wrote:
> This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a
> working polkit gui setu
This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a working
polkit gui setup out of the box.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293655
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:23:48 -
" mastaiza" wrote:
> When you install through yumex-dnf not a window to enter the password.
> I'm not exactly sure but lacks the components lxqt-sudo lxqt-admin
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking here, but it sounds like
pe
When you install through yumex-dnf not a window to enter the password.
I'm not exactly sure but lacks the components lxqt-sudo lxqt-admin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 24.02.2015 17:48, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive
for me: Qt4
All LXQt for now is Qt5 based.
Qupzilla should also built on Qt5, judging i.e. from [1].
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/qup
Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive
for me: Qt4
All LXQt for now is Qt5 based.
[]'s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> We'r
On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Yes
We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and
with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued
0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ).
For the spin, we had a small discussi
Yes
We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and
with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued
0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ).
For the spin, we had a small discussion on default applications, with
are a mixed feeling between
On Feb 24, 2015 2:57 AM, "Jaroslav Reznik" wrote:
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt
>
> Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro ,
> Christoph Wickert
>
> Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedo
= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt
Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro ,
Christoph Wickert
Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedora.
* This Change is announced after the Change Submission Deadline as an
exception to the process
62 matches
Mail list logo
