Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-10-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Orion Poplawski wrote: > I know there are some reviews in progress for llvm3X packages, one of > which may be for julia. Ewww!!! Are you also namespacing the symbols (using C++ namespaces)? If not, this is a surefire recipe for symbol conflicts and thus crashes! Anything that ends up directly o

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-28 Thread Dave Johansen
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > >> > > It's llvm, the

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 21/09/15 03:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the >> cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be >> backwards-compatible? > OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a > strong

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-24 Thread drago01
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: >> > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm >> > > release

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-24 Thread Dave Johansen
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm > release is > > > backwards compatible. > > > > Yes, so unless someone is p

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm release is > > backwards compatible. > > Yes, so unless someone is pretty familiar with LLVM upstream, keep > reading every changeset, n

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the > > cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be > > backwards-compatible? > > OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain card

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-21 Thread Kamil Paral
> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the > cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be > backwards-compatible? OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a strong marketing point. Personally I'm very much looki

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-20 Thread Christopher Meng
On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm release is > backwards compatible. Yes, so unless someone is pretty familiar with LLVM upstream, keep reading every changeset, no body can guarantee what will happen. -- Yours sincerely, Christoph

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-20 Thread David Airlie
- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, 19 September, 2015 1:17:45 AM > Subject: Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23 > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 00:16 -0400, David Airlie wrote: > >

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 00:16 -0400, David Airlie wrote: > Hi, > > So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get > OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. > > The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and > pocl, I've done my best to make them work, > pocl I

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 à 00:16 -0400, David Airlie a écrit : > Hi, > > So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get > OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. > > The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and > pocl, I've done my best to make them work

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-17 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/16/2015 10:16 PM, David Airlie wrote: Hi, So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've done my best to make them work, pocl I've rebased to git, whi

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-16 Thread Fabian Deutsch
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:16 AM, David Airlie wrote: > Hi, > > So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1 > support on the radeonsi GPUs. > > The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've > done my best to make them work, > pocl I'

llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-16 Thread David Airlie
Hi, So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've done my best to make them work, pocl I've rebased to git, which seems to be upstream advice julia I've upda