On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hello,
>
> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:55:08PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Adam Tkac :
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> >> Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.
2010/7/1 Adam Tkac :
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>
> Hello,
>
>> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
>> Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
>> obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in l
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello,
> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
2010/7/1 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:10:11 -0500,
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> Another wrinkle here is both libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo existing in
>> rawhide/repo. Shouldn't libjpeg get removed now? Doing so should help
>> matters too.
>
> If someone looks at that, they might als
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:10:11 -0500,
Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Another wrinkle here is both libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo existing in
> rawhide/repo. Shouldn't libjpeg get removed now? Doing so should help
> matters too.
If someone looks at that, they might also want to look at dropping 'man'
w
Rex Dieter wrote:
> James Antill wrote:
>
>> # repoquery --repoid=rawhide --provides libjpeg-turbo-utils | fgrep .so.
>> # /usr/bin/yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide \
>>--installroot /tmp/mock-tst install graphviz
>> [...]
>> --> Processing Dependency: libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) for pack
James Antill wrote:
> # repoquery --repoid=rawhide --provides libjpeg-turbo-utils | fgrep .so.
> # /usr/bin/yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide \
>--installroot /tmp/mock-tst install graphviz
> [...]
> --> Processing Dependency: libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) for package:
> graphviz-2.26.0-3.fc1
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:16 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:11 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> >
> >
> > > So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly
> > > when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep fo
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:16:11 -0400, seth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:11 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > So this is a bug with yum not handling package
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:16:11 -0400, seth wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:11 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> >
> >
> > > So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly
> > > when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep for gr
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:11 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
>
>
> > So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly
> > when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep for graphviz?
>
> I suspect the problem is that libjpeg-turbo doe
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly
> when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep for graphviz?
I suspect the problem is that libjpeg-turbo does not _provide_ libjpeg.
So yum does:
1. pkg XYZ requires libjpeg
2
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt :
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen wrote:
> >
> >> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
> >> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
> >
> > root.log of
> > http:/
2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt :
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen wrote:
>
>> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
>> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
>
> root.log of
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
> doesn't refe
2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
> I played with it a little bit more last night, the problem occurred when
> my package pulled in graphviz. Graphviz has a BR:libjpeg-devel, and
> makes no mention of libjpeg-utils. It only relies on libjpeg for the
> libraries, and doesn't need any of the utils (my packag
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen wrote:
> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
root.log of
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
doesn't refer to libjpeg-turbo-utils at all, but just
On 6/30/2010 5:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:25:37 +0100, Peter wrote:
>
>>> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
>>> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils. I don't know why
>>> Rich's package failed to build on koji, the prob
Hi.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
I assume that you cannot really install libjpeg-turbo-utils without
pulling in libjpeg-turbo, so the the obsoletes
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:25:37 +0100, Peter wrote:
> > libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
> > libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils. I don't know why
> > Rich's package failed to build on koji, the problem is a bit weird.
> > Among 5 packages which requ
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt :
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
>>> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message
2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt :
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
>> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
>> > obsoletes libjpeg-
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-d
2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
> Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies for my other BuildRequires,
it
25 matches
Mail list logo
