Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Oh. Found error in my repoquery. Thank you. On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:11:31 +0900 Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: > > I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a > > more proper way. > > I was triggered by maintainer of only depe

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Orion Poplawski wrote on 2022/10/05 22:25: On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly depend

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Tomas Hrcka
the build is now untagged from f38 On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:34 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: > >> I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it > >> in a more proper way. > >> I was t

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so I strongly believe it's OK in this c

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so I strongly believe it's OK in this case. Seems not actually: dnf repoque

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so I strongly believe it's OK in this case. On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 10:51:20 +0200 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 9:24 AM Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > > New version of libharu is building for rawhide with coresponding soname bump. > Only vtk should be affected right now. I see that you have already built libharu-2.4.2-1.fc38. Did you also handle rebuilding dependent packages, or sho

libharu soname bump for rawhide

2022-10-05 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
New version of libharu is building for rawhide with coresponding soname bump. Only vtk should be affected right now. -- Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor