On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 22:07:03 +0100,
Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> Probably posting it to the wrong place, but does this court ruling set the
> precedent to allowing the libdvdcss library to be part of Fedora?
I wouldn't expect so. Distributing circumvention tools is probably still
be a problem eve
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:07:03 +0100
Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> Probably posting it to the wrong place, but does this court ruling
> set the precedent to allowing the libdvdcss library to be part of
> Fedora?
Legal list please?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
kevin
signature
Probably posting it to the wrong place, but does this court ruling set the
precedent to allowing the libdvdcss library to be part of Fedora?
"Merely bypassing a technological protection that restricts a user from
> viewing or using a work is insufficient to trigger the (Digital Millennium
> Copyr
