Re: libc_malloc_debug.so vs .so.0 in glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Thanks - I made this change to nbdkit: > > https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/8972831aa2a32d4b5820465d37c1827eb76450e4 > > Will the .0 ever change? I can't see a reason for it to ever change; I'd say it's unlikelier than the .6 in

Re: libc_malloc_debug.so vs .so.0 in glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:42:32AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Anyway this is not the reason why I'm writing this email on Fedora > > devel list. In the Fedora package we have: > > > > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so

Re: libc_malloc_debug.so vs .so.0 in glibc 2.34

2021-08-23 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
[cursed email aliases!] On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:42 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Anyway this is not the reason why I'm writing this email on Fedora > > devel list. In the Fedora package we have: > > > > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/l

libc_malloc_debug.so vs .so.0 in glibc 2.34

2021-08-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I can't say I'm a huge fan of the new libc_malloc_debug.so library which is now required to do malloc checking: * Debugging features in malloc such as the MALLOC_CHECK_ environment variable (or the glibc.malloc.check tunable), mtrace() and mcheck() have now been disabled by default in th