Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Alberto Bertogli
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:15:26PM +, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> File a glibc bug. > > > > Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?) > > > > Upstream and link to upst

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > File a glibc bug. > > Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?) Both doesn't hurt, but you can just file in Fedora and let the package maintainer handle escalating it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: >> File a glibc bug. > > Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?) > Upstream and link to upstream bug in fedora bug tracker. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Alberto Bertogli
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > File a glibc bug. Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?) Thanks, Alberto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Roland McGrath
File a glibc bug. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Alberto Bertogli
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > > Do you have any idea what may be causing this? > > Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just > "ld"? Yes. $ ld -o libccheck.so -lc -shared && ldd li

Re: ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Jones
On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > Do you have any idea what may be causing this? Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just "ld"? I'm guessing that you're hitting ld.gold by default and it's behaving slightly differently than the old binutils linker

ldd regression in F14B

2010-10-04 Thread Alberto Bertogli
Hi! I installed F14B on a 64-bit VM (kvm) to give it a try, and see if some projects worked fine on it. One didn't, and while debugging the issue, I found what I believe is a regression in ldd. That is, it used to work on F13, but now it doesn't. I asked on #fedora if I should file a bug and th