Please take discussions like these to the installer development list;
fedora-devel is too broad a list to discuss mintuae like this I think.
On 01/20/2013 05:15 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> we see 3 items, one of them "no disk selected"
> it has the same level of importance as the rest two,
> I bel
On 01/21/2013 07:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> * DO NOT REWRITE code! It will ALWAYS break things!
You're joking, right? If nobody ever rewrote code... we wouldn't have Linux.
~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:17:48 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
> > I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
> > have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases.
>
> The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
> RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.c
John Reiser wrote:
> I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
> have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases.
The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-RHL9.html
| Memory:
| - Minimum for text-m
On 01/21/2013 06:30 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> For the last four hours I was trying to install Fedora 18-64 on the computer
> and for an hour and a half I've been trying to do an install that hasn't
> worked; if was like experiencing Microsoft's "blue screen of death".
> Thankfully after pulli
> I believe that fedora-18 can be installed using less [than 511MB] RAM, ...
Yes. I just successfully completed a default install of Gnome3 desktop
from Fedora-18-x86_64-DVD,iso (converted to USB2.0 using livecd-iso-to-disk)
using only the additional kernel boot parameters " mem=383m nomemcheck"
For the last four hours I was trying to install Fedora 18-64 on the
computer and for an hour and a half I've been trying to do an install that
hasn't worked; if was like experiencing Microsoft's "blue screen of death".
Thankfully after pulling out the CD I had 17 installed.
And... um... this isn't
On 01/21/2013 04:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> In addition, Anaconda's memory use has been skyrocketing for several
> releases, and the design changes in F18 have done nothing to address that
> issue. (In fact, they likely made it worse.)
That claim is dead wrong, at least for graphical install
...and what are we to do when the screen goes black?
On Jan 20, 2013 2:15 AM, "Muayyad AlSadi" wrote:
> hi,
>
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
>
> let me mention some
> I've
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
And worse, it's got a known bug list longer than Window$ 95's!
The way this was handled is really a catastrophe and sh
my point was not about my specific case, I have managed to install fedora 18
the point is about to tell the user what he has done wrong and how he
should correct it.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:15 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > hi,
>
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:15 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
>
>
> let me mention some
>
> I've tried fedora 18 live cd,
>
>
>
hi,
the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
experiance point of view
let me mention some
I've tried fedora 18 live cd,
I was offered to choose LVM, standard or BTRFS
and later went through partitioning process an
13 matches
Mail list logo
