On 06/27/2012 12:26 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> Looking trough the exceptions lists on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases:
>
> Things that would make it more likely to grant a request:
>
> * The package is a "leaf" node. Nothing depends on it or requires
>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ?
>
> I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote
> -1
> The
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ?
I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote
-1
There is a reason why those update policies exist: Fedora is no rolling
releas
I would like to upgrade Apache Traffic Server (ATS) from v3.0.x to new
stable branch v3.2.x. The 3.2 branch has lots of improvements for IPv6
and SSL that are important to me, and also fixes a crash I've been
hitting in v3.0. But, unfortunately there are a couple of incompatible
config file changes
