On Thu, 10.02.11 09:33, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
> > > think it is too good idea.
> >
> > Well, I think the fear of making
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
> > think it is too good idea.
>
> Well, I think the fear of making something SUID root is not reason
> enough not to make things technically correct.
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Fact is that people have been requesting the ability to have guaranteed
> clean-up of processes on logout, and we do provide this now (though only
> opt-in) with systemd. If this is enabled this currently breaks
> screen. And I think it would make sense to (optionally)
Le Mer 9 février 2011 10:33, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> It's kind of ironic that our main UI (gnome3) is changing to be more
> video-appliance-like, but at the same time we've been killing all the bits
> like background processes that would have made it a good appliance fit (see
> also freedombo
On Wed, 09.02.11 10:33, Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mail...@laposte.net) wrote:
>
> Le Mar 8 février 2011 15:05, Tomas Mraz a écrit :
>
> > I think much more reasonable is to just accept the fact that it might be
> > very reasonable and desirable on some multiuser system to allow users
> > having b
Le Mar 8 février 2011 15:05, Tomas Mraz a écrit :
> I think much more reasonable is to just accept the fact that it might be
> very reasonable and desirable on some multiuser system to allow users
> having background processes that can keep running even after the user
> logs out and not to try to
Le Mar 8 février 2011 08:42, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
>> 4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
>> to your
On Tue, 08.02.11 15:05, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Precisely for issues like this XDG_RUNTIME_DIR has recently been
> > introduced:
> >
> > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
> >
> > We carefully made sure to define the semantics of this dir to o
O
n Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:28 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > [Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
> > > after logout blindly on all systems.
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:28 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > [Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
> > after logout blindly on all systems.
>
> Not that I disagree with your statement (I tend to agree) in gen
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> [Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
> after logout blindly on all systems.
Not that I disagree with your statement (I tend to agree) in general,
but how is "screen is running but detached" morally equivalent
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 12:40 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 12:09, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > -
On Tue, 08.02.11 12:09, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > - $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory instead of
> > > /var/run/scr
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > - $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory instead of
> > /var/run/screen
>
> $HOME is no place to place unix sockets. Unfortunately $HOME might be
> o
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
> 4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
> to your old screen session.
>
> There are actually three incompatible chan
Hi,
just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
to your old screen session.
There are actually three incompatible changes:
- the change in screen protocol
- $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory inst
16 matches
Mail list logo
