Re: Modern C i686 failures

2024-01-24 Thread Michael J Gruber
Yaakov Selkowitz venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-24 21:01:39: > The GCC 14 and Modern C changes have caused a large number of build > failures. No surprise there, but in particular though, a lot of these > failures have only occurred on i686, e.g. uint64_t (aka long long > unsigned int) doesn't match

Modern C i686 failures

2024-01-24 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
The GCC 14 and Modern C changes have caused a large number of build failures. No surprise there, but in particular though, a lot of these failures have only occurred on i686, e.g. uint64_t (aka long long unsigned int) doesn't match long unsigned int *, etc. A few examples: gnome-keyring: https:

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-19 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM gil wrote: > > > Il 16/06/2016 22:32, Dan Horák ha scritto: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:16:38 + > Christopher wrote: > > > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures > [1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The >

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-17 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM Mat Booth wrote: > On 16 June 2016 at 20:16, Christopher wrote: > >> I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on >> i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I >> don't really have any good 32-bit environ

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread Mat Booth
On 16 June 2016 at 20:16, Christopher wrote: > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on > i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I > don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop > isn't really suitable

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread gil
Il 16/06/2016 22:32, Dan Horák ha scritto: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:16:38 + Christopher wrote: I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures [1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:16:38 + Christopher wrote: > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures > [1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The > thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test > this locally. Hadoop isn't reall

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread gil
Il 16/06/2016 21:19, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto: On 06/16/2016 03:16 PM, Christopher wrote: >I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 >in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't >really have any good 32-bit environment to

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/16/2016 03:16 PM, Christopher wrote: > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 > in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't > really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't > really suitable for

i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread Christopher
I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't really suitable for 32-bit architectures (IMO) and I doubt it's a well