Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Incidentally I have rebuilt: > nekovm-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.i686 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.c

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:18:32 +0100, Henrik wrote: > > This should work: > > > > $ repoquery --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-updates --releasever=rawhide > > --whatrequires libmysqlclient_r.so.16\* > > There is also the isuse of libmysql_client.so.16 vs > libmysql_client_r.so.16. > > repoquery --di

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-26 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2010-12-25 klockan 17:09 -0500 skrev Orcan Ogetbil: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Michael Schwendt writes: > >> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:37 -0500, Tom wrote: > >>> I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? > > > >> You are on x86_64, right? > >> I w

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Schwendt writes: >> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:37 -0500, Tom wrote: >>> I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? > >> You are on x86_64, right? >> I would estimate these are only the multilib packages in the x86_64 repo,

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Schwendt writes: > On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:37 -0500, Tom wrote: >> I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? > You are on x86_64, right? > I would estimate these are only the multilib packages in the x86_64 repo, Ah, bingo. So is there a way to get repoquery to not

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:37 -0500, Tom wrote: > I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? > > $ rpm -qf $(which repoquery) > yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc13.noarch You are on x86_64, right? This is on F13 x86_64: $ repoquery --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-updates --whatrequires --re

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:37 -0500, Tom wrote: > >> What is wrong with the above query? > > > $ rpm -qf $(which repoquery) > > yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc14.noarch > > I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? > > $ rpm -qf $(which repoquery) > yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc13.noarch > >

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Schwendt writes: > On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:33:43 -0500, Tom wrote: >> What is wrong with the above query? > $ rpm -qf $(which repoquery) > yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc14.noarch I'm still on F13, but theoretically it should be the same no? $ rpm -qf $(which repoquery) yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc13.noa

Re: hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:33:43 -0500, Tom wrote: > According to repoquery, there are only four packages depending on > libmysqlclient_r: > > $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libmysqlclient_r.so.16 > > mysql++-0:3.1.0-2.fc14.i686 > mysql-connector-c++-0:1.1.0-0.4.bzr895.fc15

hmm, repoquery lied to me

2010-12-25 Thread Tom Lane
According to repoquery, there are only four packages depending on libmysqlclient_r: $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libmysqlclient_r.so.16 mysql++-0:3.1.0-2.fc14.i686 mysql-connector-c++-0:1.1.0-0.4.bzr895.fc15.i686 nekovm-0:1.8.1-1.fc13.i686 qt-mysql-1:4.7.1-5.fc15.i686