Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-28 Thread John5342
On 28 Feb 2013 14:48, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote: > > On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying > > >

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-28 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote: > On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying > > to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while... > > > > I also think we should really get ll

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-28 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 12:01, Jens Petersen wrote: > > There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from > > the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really > > like it if I could go through F18 without having to build my own > > private parallel installa

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-19 Thread Jens Petersen
Ok, llvm-3.2 is now in F19 Rawhide. [1] Mesa, gambas3, and OpenGTL have been rebuilt, which should take care of libllvm dependencies, except for "pure" which no longer seems [2] to build with libedit [3]. :-| Jens [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5031762 [2] http://koji.fe

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-18 Thread John5342
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: >> Are there any plans to bring this to F18? > > Good question > >> There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from >> the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really >> like it if I could go through F18 w

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-18 Thread Jens Petersen
> Are there any plans to bring this to F18? Good question > There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from > the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really > like it if I could go through F18 without having to build my own > private parallel installable llv

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-13 Thread John5342
On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote: > > Hi, > > I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying > to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while... > > I also think we should really get llvm-3.2 into Fedora 19. > I have done a few tests and scratch builds in >

headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-13 Thread Jens Petersen
Hi, I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while... I also think we should really get llvm-3.2 into Fedora 19. I have done a few tests and scratch builds in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903100 and am plan