python-docker is in rawhide (was Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide)

2017-02-20 Thread Tomas Tomecek
I just built python-docker in rawhide. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=860378 The biggest change is that `python-docker` does NOT provide `python-docker-py`, this means two things: 1. You can't have both packages installed. 2. You can still use `python-docker-py`. 3. You

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-15 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:32 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" > wrote: > > > > On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: > > Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth > m> > > wrote: > > > On 13 February

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-15 Thread James Hogarth
On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" wrote: On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> am planning to update packa

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-14 Thread James Hogarth
On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-14 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x > >> series in > >> rawhide. The update should happe

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series >> in >> rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 >> (and >> he

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > Hello, > > am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series > in > rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 > (and > hence we can have docker-compose 1.11 in F26). The reason this

heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Hello, am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series in rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 (and hence we can have docker-compose 1.11 in F26). The reason this is important is that 2.x is not backwards compatible with 1.x. Here