Colin Walters wrote:
> In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss not shipping gtk2
> in the default image, we can revisit this issue =) For now, keeping
> it in gtk2 seems fine to me.
I don't see a good reason not to do the right thing right now.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their
> own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require. That might be the best
> way to resolve that.
Right, the correct solution is to put this into a gtk-common subpackage
required by both gtk2 and gtk
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their
> own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require. That might be the best way
> to resolve that.
In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss not shipping gtk
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:54:56PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "MC" == Matthias Clasen writes:
> >
> > MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
> > MC> dropped (since they were identical to t
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "MC" == Matthias Clasen writes:
>
> MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
> MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
> MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-u
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:00 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I have built most packages that had a gtk3 dependency already, and
> tagged them into rawhide. The following are the leftovers:
> libindicator-gtk3
I see you committed a bump+rebuild but didn't actually push a build,
AFAICT - I can't se
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen writes:
>
> MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
> MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
> MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
> MC> of
> "MC" == Matthias Clasen writes:
MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
MC> of a gtk3-using package, you should add Req
I have just tagged gtk3-2.99.0 into rawhide. There are abi and api
changes, so all dependent packages will have to be rebuilt (the most
obvious change is that the libraries are now called libg[dt]k-3.0.so
instead of libg[gt]k-x11-3.0.so).
There are a number of api changes that I am not going to li
