Re: Making sense of golang packaging guidelines

Hi Fabio, Robert-André, Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense. Golang has this uniqueness about libs that removes some of the shared objects pros but I see there are other things at play. Thank you, Carlos. On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:44 PM wrote: > On 7/20/23 8:20 PM, Carlos Rodriguez F

Re: Making sense of golang packaging guidelines

On 7/20/23 8:20 PM, Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez wrote: Hi all, I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and I read through the guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/

Re: Making sense of golang packaging guidelines

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:22 PM Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and > I read through the guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ > > My question is more about the rea

Making sense of golang packaging guidelines

Hi all, I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and I read through the guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ My question is more about the reasoning for the recommended handling of dependencies. Other language platforms hav

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

Le mercredi 27 mars 2019 à 19:13 +, David Dykstra a écrit : Hi David, > > I'd like to see clarity on the guidelines for golang applications as > opposed to golang libraries. It seems to assume from the start that > it's talking about libraries, based on the package naming > requirement. From

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

dora people, > > As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines > have always been simply a «???draft???». Part of the new Go SIG mission is to > update ours best practices and tooling. As such, Nicolas Mailhot designed a > new set of macros based on

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 7:46:23 PM > Subject: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated > > Hello Fedora people, > > As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines > have always been simply a « draft ». Part of

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

On Friday, 22 March 2019 22:37:06 CET Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi Robert-André, > > It looks like you put a lot of work into this - I don't think I've > seen as comprehensive a documentation as this Draft is for any other > aspect of packaging (but well, Go packaging is notoriously difficult >

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello Fedora people, > > As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines > have always been simply a « draft ». Part of the new Go SIG mission is to > update ours best practices an

New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

Hello Fedora people, As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines have always been simply a « draft ». Part of the new Go SIG mission is to update ours best practices and tooling. As such, Nicolas Mailhot designed a new set of macros based on lua script to

Re: golang packaging guidelines

I just discussed it on packaging list. Maybe we can let everyone edit it and then summarize them up? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

golang packaging guidelines

Now that golang is packaged (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281), we might want to have some packaging guidelines. I have never done this, does anyone want to give it a try? renich has started this but it is quite preliminary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renich/Go_Packagin