On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:32:34AM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> Fedora's patched kernel sources in a git repository and then include
>> kernel-2.6.38-1.1.fc15.tar.bz2 in the source RPM instead of vanilla
>> kernel-2.6.38.tar.bz2 and fifty
On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2011/2/27 Kyle McMartin :
>> Our workflow is an SRPM of patches, so that's what we work with.
>
> You really do that "by hand", without some sort of patch manager?
The spec file and the fedora packaging scm *are* the patch manager.
Seriously,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:32:34AM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Fedora's patched kernel sources in a git repository and then include
> kernel-2.6.38-1.1.fc15.tar.bz2 in the source RPM instead of vanilla
> kernel-2.6.38.tar.bz2 and fifty patches. Red Hat appears to do this
> with RHEL 6's k
2011/2/27 Kyle McMartin :
> Our workflow is an SRPM of patches, so that's what we work with.
You really do that "by hand", without some sort of patch manager?
--
Thomas Moschny
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:14:48PM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've got an interesting idea - why not to provide a git repository
> with the sources of current Fedora kernel? This could simplify the
> maintenance of patches, allows other to easily backport stuff from
> kernel.org's m
2011/2/25 Garrett Holmstrom :
> While I can see how this might make things a bit easier, it can obscure
> what commits are Fedora-specific as they are lost in the sea of the
> upstream kernel's commits, making me firmly against the proposal.
Using topgit to control the Fedora patches would be an o
On 2/25/2011 7:19, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> I've got an interesting idea - why not to provide a git repository
>> with the sources of current Fedora kernel? This could simplify the
>> maintenance of patches, allows other to easily backport stuff from
>> kernel.org's master and greatly improves t
Hi,
2011/2/25 Peter Lemenkov :
> Hello.
>
> I've got an interesting idea - why not to provide a git repository
> with the sources of current Fedora kernel? This could simplify the
> maintenance of patches, allows other to easily backport stuff from
> kernel.org's master and greatly improves the cu
Hello.
I've got an interesting idea - why not to provide a git repository
with the sources of current Fedora kernel? This could simplify the
maintenance of patches, allows other to easily backport stuff from
kernel.org's master and greatly improves the current situation with
transparency of develo
