On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:31:14PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in late, I'm sporadically online while on parental
> leave (haven't been able to touch my laptop for the past few days!)
No need to be sorry. :) Congrats!
> Mass-branching does seem too different from what
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:55:44AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> That would be more or less what Ubuntu universe is doing: branch every
> package in Fedora, build it once for EPEL, and then just let it rot unless a
> maintainer volunteers to actually maintain it. It might be better than
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I have a couple of packages which I find handy to have in EPEL -- little
> command line utilities, mostly -- and which have very little change over
> time and which I'm 99.9% will just build on EPEL 9. My EPEL maintenance
> policy is basically "build once when there is a new
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 16:24 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:55PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > In any case, I'm not convinced mass branching is ever going to work
> > for
> > epel. Although I suppose as more packages have the epel packager
> > sig
> > group on them, tha
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:55PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In any case, I'm not convinced mass branching is ever going to work for
> epel. Although I suppose as more packages have the epel packager sig
> group on them, that group could work on faster adding piles of packages.
> Perhaps we shou
