On 12/12/2011 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 12/12/2011 12:08 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
I like this one, since it seems to be the easiest solution from my POV.
But I don't see necessary to solve conflicts using renaming library and
header files. I'd rather just let compat-gdbm-devel and gdbm-dev
On 12/12/2011 07:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 12/09/2011 10:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
compat-gdbm package, which sh
On 12/12/2011 08:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> To me, the easiest solution for you is probably going to be dropping ypserv
> from the distribution. But if that's not possible, then attempting to
> convince the gdbm upstream to switch back to GPLv2+ would likely be
> a worthwhile investment.
On
On 12/12/2011 12:08 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> I like this one, since it seems to be the easiest solution from my POV.
>
> But I don't see necessary to solve conflicts using renaming library and
> header files. I'd rather just let compat-gdbm-devel and gdbm-devel
> sub-packages to conflict (use "C
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 10:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> >
> >> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
> >> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
> >
>
On 12/09/2011 10:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
>
>> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
>> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
>
> The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>
> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
> stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by june 2012 and CVE fixes by
> june 2013.
From what I
On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use
the gdbm-devel package for this.
Since Thorsten K
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:21:52PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
> >
> > A qui
On 11/14/2011 06:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
>
> avahi-ui-tools (LGPLv2)
> gnu-smalltalk (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
> jpilot-
On 11/14/2011 12:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> ruby-libs ((Ruby or GPLv2) and (GPL+ or Artistic))
> ypserv (GPLv2)
At a quick glance, these are the only two areas of licensing concern,
and Ruby can be resolved with a major version update as pointed out
elsewhere.
Thorsten, would you be willing to
On 11/14/2011 08:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>>
Le 14/11/2011 20:12, Iain Arnell a écrit :
>
> Also without reading the source, just the license tags, all of those
> "Lessers" and "pluses" make most of them compatible. Even Perl's
> "unholy" license (really (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)
> and Copyright Only and MIT and Public Domai
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
> libguestfs (LGPLv2+)
The LGPLv2+ libguestfs.so libr
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
> >
> > A quick scan says this affects:
> [...]
On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
[...]
> ypserv (GPLv2)
This one looks like an incompatibility.
--
devel mai
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
A quick scan says this affects:
avahi-ui-tools (LGPLv2)
gnu-smalltalk (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
jpilot-backup (GPLv2+)
libguestfs (LGPLv2+)
librep (GPLv2+)
man-d
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
Cheers,
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
