On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:11:20AM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 1/28/2011 0:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Care to share details? Of course there were many changes in the C++ FE,
> > especially for C++0x, and maybe some warnings changed into errors, but
> > nothing I'd describe as a lot. We
On 1/28/2011 0:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Care to share details? Of course there were many changes in the C++ FE,
> especially for C++0x, and maybe some warnings changed into errors, but
> nothing I'd describe as a lot. We haven't still written
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html so if y
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:29:45PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > On 1/27/2011 23:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > > I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
> > > failed to compile [1]. I was told that #inclu
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:29:45PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 23:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
> > failed to compile [1]. I was told that #include was missing.
> > So I have two questions: why did including t
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:26:36AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
> failed to compile [1]. I was told that #include was missing.
> So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
> necessary (code builds f
W dniu 28.01.2011 08:26, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
> failed to compile [1]. I was told that #include was missing.
> So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
> necessary (code builds fine with
On 1/27/2011 23:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
> failed to compile [1]. I was told that #include was missing.
> So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
> necessary (code builds fine with 4.5) and are
Hi,
I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
failed to compile [1]. I was told that #include was missing.
So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
necessary (code builds fine with 4.5) and are there any other issues we
package monkeys migh
