2014-05-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Tim St Clair :
> I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
>
At a first glance this seems like a bug in llvm-config, nothing obviously
related to “default” cflags.
http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-con
On Sat, 31 May 2014 00:31:50 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As of 2014, I only know two cases where clang is still better: more complete
> caret diagnostics, and better recovery from invalid types (clang provides
> suggestions and uses it for the rest of the compilation to avoid cascaded
> error mes
Tim St Clair wrote:
> I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily
> packaging.
Non-RPM compilation shouldn't be ending up with distro CFLAGS at all.
(They're called RPM_OPT_FLAGS for a reason.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
Il 30/05/2014 11:03, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> >Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons,
is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
>
> I think FPC (and/or FESCO) should decide on whether we want to
> allow/disallow using clang for official Fedora rpms.
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:03 -0400, Tim St Clair wrote:
> I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily
> packaging.
>
> The default CFLAGS cause clang to fail 'out of the gate'. Given the
> popularity rise in the compiler, and the increase # of open tickets
> upstream arou
of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:03:57 AM
> Subject: Re: fedoras default cflags & clang
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
> &
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
> >I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
> >
> >Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reason
On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is
there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
I think FPC (and/or FES
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Tim St Clair wrote:
> I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
>
> Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various
> reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is
there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
--
Cheers,
Tim
Freedom, Features, Friends, First -> Fedora
https:
10 matches
Mail list logo