On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:44:59AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago, I reset my Fedora notifications to the defaults
> (previously it was just stuff from before I was a packager). As a
> member of various SIGs, this means I get a lot of no
Hello,
Some time ago, I reset my Fedora notifications to the defaults
(previously it was just stuff from before I was a packager). As a
member of various SIGs, this means I get a lot of notifications for
packages that are not mine. I am fine with this generally.
However, I don't really
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:23:49AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 02:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Can you provide more info?
> > Was this an irc or email message?
> > or was it in the git push?
>
> It was an email notification.
ok, then likely it was FMN, so a issue at
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 02:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Can you provide more info?
> Was this an irc or email message?
> or was it in the git push?
It was an email notification.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:21:14AM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 10:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > No idea where to report these:
> >
> >
> > | Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 09:55:53 UTC
> > |
> > | mschwendt pushed 1 commit to rpms/claws-mail (el6)
> > | https://src.fedorapr
On 30/01/2020 10:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
No idea where to report these:
| Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 09:55:53 UTC
|
| mschwendt pushed 1 commit to rpms/claws-mail (el6)
| https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/claws-mail/branch/el6
Not Found
The requested URL was not found on
No idea where to report these:
| Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 09:55:53 UTC
|
| mschwendt pushed 1 commit to rpms/claws-mail (el6)
| https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/claws-mail/branch/el6
Not Found
The requested URL was not found on the server. If you entered the URL manually
p
ant to watch or
look further to investigate.
kevin
--
> -- Forwarded message -
> From:
> Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:10 PM
> Subject: Fedora Notifications Digest (2 updates)
> To:
>
>
&g
Why do sometimes notifications have empty message lines like the following?
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:10 PM
Subject: Fedora Notifications Digest (2 updates)
To:
Digest Summary:
1.
2
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 14:09 +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora
> > Notifications?
> > It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party
> >
On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications?
> It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party
> Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user unders
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications?
> It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party
> Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how
> to use it.
"
On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications?
> It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party
> Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand
Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications?
It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party
Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how
to use it.
_
Greetings.
The Fedora Notifications System, available at:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
Is a way for interested parties to be notified when events occur in
Fedora. This system currently allows for IRC and/or Email notifications
of events, as well as "digesting" a
José AbílioOn Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:43:20 PM WEST Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I submmitted https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues/75
Following Kevin and pingou's message I have switched browsers. I used QupZilla
and it worked. Strange...
Regards,
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:27:23 AM WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've not seen it before. Best place would be:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues
Thank you.
I submmitted https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues/75
> > The issue here is that I do not know if the problem lie
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:32:09 +0100
José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I send this here in case someone has seen this and if not
> where to report.
I've not seen it before. Best place would be:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues
> I want to configure the notifications to receiv
Hi,
I send this here in case someone has seen this and if not where to
report.
I want to configure the notifications to receive email for the messages I am
interested in.
I go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
and login.
Then I choose email and I add the email address I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
I
Dne 8.12.2015 v 13:15 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 08/12/15 12:05, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
>> I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
>> know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
>> be pushed to st
On 08/12/15 12:05, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the thre
Hi,
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
regards,
Nikos
[0].
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:56:25 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> All filters are applied to all "events" (i.e. "notifications").
> That makes each filter an OR operand of another logical conjunction.
typo: "disjunction", of course
filter1 OR filter 2 OR filter3 ...
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
> At the top of the filter I can read:
>
> | (all these rules must be satisfied for the notification to be sent)
>
> This is misleading. Actually, only all the green "include" rules must
> match (= be satisfied) for a notification to survive the filter. Any
> red "ignore" rule that causes a mat
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:15:41 +0200
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > I'm still in search of a howto. A howto about the user-interface, the
> > various filters and rules, and real documentation about how to use it.
>
> I don't think there
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:10:29 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > If I log in, which is very slow and takes some time, I see two
> > "filters" with lots of rules. I'd like to understand these defaults.
>
> Right, you should see "irc" and "email" on the first screen.
>
> These are the rules for each ty
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:15:41 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:05:10 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > > I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> > > about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> > > notifications as usual.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:05:10 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> > about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> > notifications as usual.
> >
> > Where would I learn about any infrastructure changes related t
Dne 12.8.2015 v 16:15 Jerry James napsal(a):
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> This sounds like a different issue. On thing we would need is to know which
>> email you are talking about.
>> All the ema
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> This sounds like a different issue. On thing we would need is to know which
> email you are talking about.
> All the emails coming from FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/no
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:05:10 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> FMN has been announced on devel-announce and devel as well as the planet. We
> have rolled out a few release including one re-working the default settings.
Hardly any filter is enabled.
Here's an announcement related to pkgdb and FM
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:20:39 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Visited
> >
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications
> >
> > and added an "include" for "All Package DB events", but below it
> > also doesn't refer to the pkgdb requests made by a fellow packager.
>
> I've got a question about
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:35:52AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> notifications as usual.
>
> Where would I learn about any infrastructure changes related to
> thi
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I've got a question about that. The last time I went out of town,
> about a month ago, I visited that page and set everything to
> "disabled" to spare myself from coming home to thousands of
> notification emails. And ... I cam home t
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:03:15AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:35:52 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> > about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> > notifications as usual.
> >
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:35:52 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Visited
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications
>
> and added an "include" for "All Package DB events", but below it
> also doesn't refer to the pkgdb requests made b
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:35:52 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> notifications as usual.
>
> Where would I learn about any infrastructure changes related to
> this?
V
I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
notifications as usual.
Where would I learn about any infrastructure changes related to
this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
2010/8/29 Mike McGrath
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2010/8/29 Gerard Braad
> > > dead
> >
> > It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place
> on
> > openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
> > p
2010/8/29 Matt McCutchen
> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > > 3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in
> http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
> > > NO. And Fedora Project is using it. I
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > 3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in
> > http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
> > NO. And Fedora Project is using it. I'm sharing a "Fedora Solution" a
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/29 Gerard Braad
> > dead
>
> It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
> openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
> participate instead of these few with wave acco
2010/8/29 Gerard Braad
> > dead
>
> It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
> openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
> participate instead of these few with wave account or those who paid
> for it ;-)
>
> Gerard
>
> --
> Gerard Braad — 吉拉德
> dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
participate instead of these few with wave account or those who paid
for it ;-)
Gerard
--
Gerard Braad — 吉拉德
Project-lead Fedora-MIPS
http://fedor
Manuel Escudero wrote:
> Shut up kevin...
Please watch your language. The points I'm making are very important,
telling me to be quiet (in a not very nice way) is not going to solve the
fundamental problem.
> the code is opensource and you can have it if you want, you can modify
> it...
The fe
2010/8/28 Kevin Kofler
> Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > We have to continue! I propouse using "Google's stuff" in order to have a
> > "Standard" for all desktops and maybe linux distros...
>
> A "standard" relying on proprietary Google (and other) web services? No
> thanks!
>
> > I called it the "Fed
Manuel Escudero wrote:
> We have to continue! I propouse using "Google's stuff" in order to have a
> "Standard" for all desktops and maybe linux distros...
A "standard" relying on proprietary Google (and other) web services? No
thanks!
> I called it the "Fedora's Engine" and is built over Google
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
> Don't they share a D-Bus API these days?
>
they do.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> Why? Just use system dbus notifications and you're done. But as I suggested -
> it
> should be used only for critical notifi
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 08:17:14 pm Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in
> > parallel to the ones already
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
wrote:
> in fact, your point means there will be two versions, KDE version &
> other desktops version,
Don't they share a D-Bus API these days?
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
2010/8/26 Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in
> > parallel to the ones already provides by the desktop environmen
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in
> parallel to the ones already provides by the desktop environment is a
> total nonstarter.
>
in fact, your
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> > 3. keep a history of the notifications
> > 4. max. number of notifications at the time
> > 5. click able notifications
> > 6. stackable notifications
>
> I think that, at least on KDE, you really want to leave
l this stuff well. Only for point 5, you
have to set some actions and handle the signals KNotify sends you. In
principle, it's also possible to disable notifications of a given class
(e.g. the one you'd define and use for the Fedora notifications) in KNotify,
but it makes more sense to
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> disabling something won't fix it, also I don't think this is that bad that
> it requires extra patch to turn it off by default and diverge from
> upstream
It shouldn't require a patch, just a config setting. That's what kde-
settings is for.
(But I also think the default
Manuel Escudero wrote:
> I dont' know if it's possible to tweak the code of these apps, Or we can
> use Google Gadgets as a Base,
Please don't rely on Google stuff. The native RSS plasmoid is just fine.
There's also Akregator, which is a regular KDE app to browse RSS feeds. We
don't really need
2010/8/25 Mika Kuusela
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:05 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>
> > Now, this is the Fedora search engine:
> >
> >
> > http://ubuntuone.com/p/DuP/
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if it's possible to integrate a search box into hermes
> > that uses that engine as a base...
>
> The
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:05 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> Now, this is the Fedora search engine:
>
>
> http://ubuntuone.com/p/DuP/
>
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to integrate a search box into hermes
> that uses that engine as a base...
The start.fedoraproject.org search engine is n
2010/8/24 Manuel Escudero
>
>
> 2010/8/24 Kevin Kofler
>
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> > disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
>> > alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
>> >
>> > You'll get tons of "User XY has changed status to:
after spending two days reading the two fedora mailing lists (fedora
users & fedora devel), i got a list of ideas that need to be
implemented in order to keep the things up:
1. the abililty to turn off the system
2. smart notifications (maybe multilanguage, geolocation-based, &
time-aware notes)
3.
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:13:29 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> >> Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of non-
> >> exceptional event at all. Is this enabled by default? If so, maybe we
> >> should disable it by default in kde-settings?
> >
> > afaik
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of non-
>> exceptional event at all. Is this enabled by default? If so, maybe we
>> should disable it by default in kde-settings?
>
> afaik it's enabled by default and not only for kopete. Kopete as many
> othe
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 21:11:56 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
> > alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
> >
> > You'll get tons of "User XY has changed status to: blah
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 06:26:52 pm Manuel Escudero wrote:
> 2010/8/24 Garrett Holmstrom
>
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through
> >
> > system
> >
> > > notifica
2010/8/24 Kevin Kofler
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
> > alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
> >
> > You'll get tons of "User XY has changed status to: blah blah"
>
> Well, IMHO Kopete shoul
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer
> alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)?
>
> You'll get tons of "User XY has changed status to: blah blah"
Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> > Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
> > on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
> > interfere with my work.
>
> It get
2010/8/24 Garrett Holmstrom
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through
> system
> > notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority
> notification like
> > "Close your desktop, nucle
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system
> notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notification
> like
> "Close your desktop, nuclear war out there" (or just a security update
> c
ion, we started with some guide lines & putted them on
> the wiki:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_notifications_system
Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system
notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notifica
On 08/24/2010 03:55 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Right. So the problem is to not actually break PackageKit's notification
> system, not to add blue tack and scotch tape on top of it.
The proposed solution is not just for package update issues but for
general announcements that are of importance to
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
> > infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
> > users?
> >
> > Or were you
On 08/23/2010 01:54 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>
> b) Let's test it first in Fedora and see how it goes, my idea was having
> a notification system that let the user Choose between what kind of news
> they wanna recieve in some part of the instalation process (trough
> anaconda) so
> if they want
2010/8/23 Adam Williamson
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
> > infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
> > users?
> >
> > Or were you expecting other types of notific
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update
> infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to
> users?
>
> Or were you expecting other types of notifications?
The motivation for this system
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
> on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
> interfere with my work.
It gets worse. I frequently come back to a desktop on which my
girlfrien
On 08/23/2010 02:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
A lowly user view here about popups ..
Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat
on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not
interfere with my work.
All the popup notifications are annoying and d
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:46 +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> Hi all,,
>
> before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list
> about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the
> fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is).
> after some discussion, we started with s
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:46 +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> Hi all,,
>
> before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list
> about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the
> fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is).
> after some discussion, we started with s
On Monday, August 23, 2010 08:19:13 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm not sure a notification applet by itself is going to be the best
> > answer here... as people may be busy or not see the notice and a few
> > seconds later it goes away and they miss it.
>
> That's why the notific
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm not sure a notification applet by itself is going to be the best
> answer here... as people may be busy or not see the notice and a few
> seconds later it goes away and they miss it.
That's why the notification should not time out unless/until the user clicks
it away!
In
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:46:43 +0400
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> Hi all,,
>
> before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list
> about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the
> fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is).
> after some discussion, we started with
2010/8/22 Till Maas
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:19:53PM +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
>
> > without help i'll not be able to continue.
> > please test the application on non-KDE desktops, think for improvements &
> > give feedbacks.
>
> Maybe you get more feedback if you make it a F15 featur
>
>
>
> 1) I was the one who put a google wave link in the wiki, I tought it might
> be a good way of comunication because anyone with a Gmail account can acess
> to a wave and use it. If someone do not have a Gmail account he/she simply
> can use the IRC, can contact anyone that's helping via the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:19:53PM +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
> without help i'll not be able to continue.
> please test the application on non-KDE desktops, think for improvements &
> give feedbacks.
Maybe you get more feedback if you make it a F15 feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
who have a googlewave account it would be nice to talk with
> him (btw, check the wiki page history to know who added that link).
> i was talking about a Fedora Notifications System, not a googlewave
> discussion.
> & after a half a day, i didn't get any feedbacks.
>
> a
o have a googlewave account it would be nice to talk with
him (btw, check the wiki page history to know who added that link).
i was talking about a Fedora Notifications System, not a googlewave
discussion.
& after a half a day, i didn't get any feedbacks.
again, if you have any idea to
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Nevertheless, imho it should not be used to develop infrastructure for Fedora,
> because people involved in Fedora might not want to use it, because it is not
> FOSS.
The less-than-clear-future roadmap for Wave as a service brings home
exactly t
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
> >> is problematic for two reasons:
> >>
> >> a) Google Wave is dead
> >> b) Noone wants to us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
>> is problematic for two reasons:
>>
>> a) Google Wave is dead
>> b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
>>
>> Rahul
>
>
>
> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
> is problematic for two reasons:
>
> a) Google Wave is dead
> b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
>
> Rahul
>
a) you're a troll
b) you're a troll
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproje
On 08/21/2010 02:16 AM, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines & put
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines & putted them on the
wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
94 matches
Mail list logo
