On Seg, 2014-09-08 at 02:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
> > sorry.
>
> Hi,
> I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds ,
no longer breaks rpmfusi
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
> sorry.
Hi,
I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds , in some packages like
kplayer [1]. rpmfusion got a older version of Mock, Version: 1.1.21 [2]
e
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 07:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
> because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
> Conflicts: systemd
>
> Example qt:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74
On 08/28/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
> is 150K or so on
On 28 August 2014 12:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > >>> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about
> how
> > >>> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at
> least
> > >>> is 1
On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
> >>> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
> >>> is 150K or so only. Is there really any value in doing this weird stuf
On Thu, 28.08.14 08:40, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
> I think that there was a problem in communication. We are *not* going to
> create systemd-container in fedora. That was just for rhel, because at
> least I wanted some quick and dirty solution. Our current plan in fedora
> i
On 08/27/2014 03:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
>>> is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
>> Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is work
>>> It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
>>> intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
>>> as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
>>> on). I made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
>>>
>>> Ping me o
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:01:45PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> >
> > I think you are readying way to much into a perfectly normal word that
> > means: "hey we are discussing stuff related to your project, would you
> > mind joi
Lennart Poettering píše v St 27. 08. 2014 v 21:15 +0200:
> On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > >I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
> > >is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
> >
> > Talk to Michal Sekletar about it the
Hi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I think you are readying way to much into a perfectly normal word that
> means: "hey we are discussing stuff related to your project, would you
> mind joining this sessions so we can have better understanding ?"
>
That's possible. The
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 16:43 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> If the general perception is that one has to be “invited” into the
> WGs, that would explain why we ended up with several WGs that are
> often not much bigger than the 9 voting places, and it would be
> something we should urgently fix (or
Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
> sorry.
Thanks, seems to have done the trick.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:
- Original Message -
> On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:47:33 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I am not on the base WG. I was not selected for it. If you come up with
> > schemes like this, it is really a good idea to actually
On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
> >is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
>
> Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is working on "something"
> we call systemd-container internal
On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:47:33 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
So what is "systemd-container" supposed to do? And what precisely is
"fakesystemd" supposed to do? And that "mini" thing?
fakesystemd owns same directories sy
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >So what is "systemd-container" supposed to do? And what precisely is
> >"fakesystemd" supposed to do? And that "mini" thing?
> fakesystemd owns same directories systemd does and has set provides
> to fulfill most RPM dependencies
On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:27:51 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:20, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
as long as it takes t
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:20, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
> It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
> intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
> as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
> on). I made a mi
Hi Lennart,
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least as
long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working on). I
made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
Ping me on IRC
On Wed, 27.08.14 07:28, Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) wrote:
> Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
> because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
> Conflicts: systemd
>
> Example qt:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
On Aug 27, 2014 9:23 PM, "Jerry Vonau" wrote:
> That has a sub-build[1] that is failing but for a different reason:
> Error: Package: harfbuzz-icu-0.9.35-2.fc22.x86_64 (build)
>Requires: libicuuc.so.52()(64bit)
>
> Might be fallout from the gcc mass rebuild.
Not that case. icu was ju
Hi,
There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
sorry.
Vaclav
On St 27. srpen 2014, 15:23:27 CEST, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On August 27, 2014 at 7:28 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds,
particularly
because it is gett
> On August 27, 2014 at 7:28 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
> Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds,
> particularly
> because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
> Conflicts: systemd
>
> Example qt:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
Conflicts: systemd
Example qt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7452802
(which is no direct systemd dependencies, mind you)
I can
26 matches
Mail list logo
