Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 17:55 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 07/27/2012 05:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I don't recall, though, whether there was a later build which aimed to > > correct this, and whether I ever got around to testing such a build if > > so. > > I presume this was the -14 to

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-27 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/27/2012 05:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: I don't recall, though, whether there was a later build which aimed to correct this, and whether I ever got around to testing such a build if so. I presume this was the -14 to -15 change since -15 worked for me: commit abd72fda51991e84a971874d7d0c

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-27 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/27/2012 04:09 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: Here you go: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/dracut/dracut-009-15.fc15/ Thanks, Harald. Wiki updated - I believe the issue is resolved. A sufficient dracut for f16 is already in the normal repos, so this shouldn't recur (unless there are

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 10:09 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 27.07.2012 06:46, schrieb Bill McGonigle: > > On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> You can build them from git I suppose. > > > > Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it > > makes > > this emb

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-27 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 27.07.2012 06:46, schrieb Bill McGonigle: > On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> You can build them from git I suppose. > > Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it > makes > this embarrassingly easy! Kudos to the team. > > dracut-009-15.fc15 worked

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: You can build them from git I suppose. Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it makes this embarrassingly easy! Kudos to the team. dracut-009-15.fc15 worked just as expected. f15->f17 went flawlessly and saved me

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:34:37 -0700 > "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > > > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade p

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:34:37 -0700 "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade path from 15 to 17 (due to > > > infrastructure details, not functio

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:51 -0400 Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 07/25/2012 12:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Change the link to: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=266766 > > That's 013-15.fc16; we need 009-13, -14, or -15.fc15. Those seem to > all be deleted from koji, even

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/25/2012 12:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Change the link to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=266766 That's 013-15.fc16; we need 009-13, -14, or -15.fc15. Those seem to all be deleted from koji, even source. Is source kept in git for older builds? -Bill -- Bill McGon

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade path from 15 to 17 (due to > > infrastructure details, not functionality). I think that means > > preupgrade won't work either (though

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 Bill McGonigle wrote: > Hi, all, > > It looks like the latest f15 dracut to ever make it to -stable was > 009-12. I ran across this when I found a laptop that hadn't been on > in a while and needed an upgrade to f17. The trick, of course, is > that convertfs

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-24 Thread Simone Caronni
On 25 July 2012 08:04, Bill McGonigle wrote: > That leaves us with no yum upgrade path from 15 to 17 (due to infrastructure > details, not functionality). Not a fix for the EOL distributions, but a quicker way than convertfs to upgrade: http://rudd-o.com/linux-and-free-software/how-to-upgrade-fe

dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-24 Thread Bill McGonigle
Hi, all, It looks like the latest f15 dracut to ever make it to -stable was 009-12. I ran across this when I found a laptop that hadn't been on in a while and needed an upgrade to f17. The trick, of course, is that convertfs went into dracut-009-13. After -13, -14 and -15 were built. The W