Re: dnf and handling kernel-devel updates correctly

2015-01-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 17:51:49 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Small addendum: if a provenpackager wants to get to this sooner, we'd be happy for the help. Just make sure to stick around for any fallout too :). The bug didn't leave it clear if installonlypkg was going to always be qualified wit

Re: dnf and handling kernel-devel updates correctly

2015-01-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Andre Robatino > wrote: >> In order for dnf to be able to handle kernel-devel updates correctly (having >> multiple versions of kernel-devel installed, one for each installed kernel), >> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: dnf and handling kernel-devel updates correctly

2015-01-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > In order for dnf to be able to handle kernel-devel updates correctly (having > multiple versions of kernel-devel installed, one for each installed kernel), > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079906 (against the kernel) > must be f

dnf and handling kernel-devel updates correctly

2015-01-06 Thread Andre Robatino
In order for dnf to be able to handle kernel-devel updates correctly (having multiple versions of kernel-devel installed, one for each installed kernel), https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079906 (against the kernel) must be fixed, but there is no response to status inquiries in the bug.