I don't want it to sounds like I'm discouraging anyone from packaging
these. I'm a well-known "packaging maximalist" :-) If they even let
me do 'dpkg-deb -c ...' then there is some use for them.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v co
On Monday, 26 בMarch 2012 13:08:33 Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> I'm still interested in making available the packages through Fedora
> repositories proper, but I'm also, admittedly, not paying attention to
> the review tickets. I have what I need (rubygem-passenger and many
> othe
On Monday, 26 בMarch 2012 11:32:10 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:57:44AM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
> >- This means that a Debian/Ubuntu workstation can build both .deb
> > and RPM packages, and we cannot use Fedora for a similar role.
>
> Is this really true? What
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is this really true? What happens if, say, your program depends on
> PCRE, which has different sonames on Debian/Ubuntu and Fedora (for
> essentially the same library):
The same thing which happens if you build for, say, RHEL 6 on Fedora 16
using mock, pbuilder is the
On 03/26/2012 01:57 AM, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 בMarch 2012 20:01:37 Kalev Lember wrote:
>> For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
>> The package was imported 21 Oct 2010 depending on a non-existing
>> "debhelper" package and has been broken ever since.
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:57:44AM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
> * IMO, it's important to have Debian packaging tools for Fedora so it
>can be used as a more complete development platform:
>- Currently, there's no problem building rpm's and yum repos on Debian
> as a development platform
On Sunday, 25 בMarch 2012 20:01:37 Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/25/2012 02:44 PM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> > Broken deps for i386
> > --
> [snip]
> > [dh-make]
> > dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
>
> For the past 17 mo
On 03/25/2012 02:44 PM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> Broken deps for i386
> --
[snip]
> [dh-make]
> dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
The package wa
