On 27 September 2012 13:13, wrote:
>> From: Adam Williamson
>> Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm
>> name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package
>> was built.
>
> I used to get tripped up on this too and I've been doing Linux since the RHL
> 4.0 days. In som
> From: Adam Williamson
> Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm
> name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package
> was built.
I used to get tripped up on this too and I've been doing Linux since the
RHL 4.0 days. In some cases it's entirely unobvious (e.g,.
pytho
On 09/26/2012 07:44 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 22:42, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>>> Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The
>>> wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped
>>> co
On 26 September 2012 22:42, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The
>> wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped
>> complaining, though that seems to be because the pac
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> >
>
> > All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the
> > packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kic
On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the
> packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kickstarts tends to lag
> behind git rather a lot because it isn't a
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> Aha:
> git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/comps.git
> commit 31d21785cc590e16256557ad6f5a51e1dad92be6
> Author: Bill Nottingham
> Date: Tue Aug 28 15:50:57 2012 -0400
>
> Rename the confusingly named and descripted 'base' to 'standard'.
>
On 25 September 2012 01:25, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 25 September 2012 00:27, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
The command is this:
livecd-creator --config=/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde-raw.ks
On 25 September 2012 00:27, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> The command is this:
>>> livecd-creator --config=/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde-raw.ks
>>> --fslabel=Fedora18-Jam --cache=/var/cache/live --releas
On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> The command is this:
>> livecd-creator --config=/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde-raw.ks
>> --fslabel=Fedora18-Jam --cache=/var/cache/live --releasever=18
>>
>> $ grep "" /var/cache/live/fedora/gen/com
On 4 September 2012 18:35, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 02:26 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> There's also a:
>> Skipping missing group 'base'
>> at the start of the livecd-creator process.
>
>
> What repository are you pointing the install at? The base group should
> exist in the group metad
On 09/02/2012 02:26 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
There's also a:
Skipping missing group 'base'
at the start of the livecd-creator process.
What repository are you pointing the install at? The base group should
exist in the group metadata (comps).
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-
Hi, think this is a dependency bug, though thought I'd check here
before filing it. I'm building a F18 compose in a F18 mock root and
getting these two errors, I've added coreutils explicitly to the
kickstart, but it doesn't get installed till later in the process.
readlink:
Installing: genisoimag
13 matches
Mail list logo
