Ian Malone wrote:
> No, what I mean is given its location how does udev ignore it and
> systemd know to find it?
That's not what happens. Those are udev rules, they're installed by the
systemd package, but processed by udev (which sticks a "uaccess" tag on the
device, which is later used by syst
On 30 March 2012 22:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
>> #This file is part of systemd.
>> And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
>> conflict over it?
>
> Because udev dropped their equi
Ian Malone wrote:
> Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
> #This file is part of systemd.
> And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
> conflict over it?
Because udev dropped their equivalent 70-acl.rules in favor of systemd's
implementat
On 27 March 2012 19:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:22 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> Or indeed, if anyone can show me where this is documented. All I've
>> managed to find with google are git commits and irrelevant mailing
>> list fragments. systemd-logind isn't documented,
>
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:22 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> Or indeed, if anyone can show me where this is documented. All I've
> managed to find with google are git commits and irrelevant mailing
> list fragments. systemd-logind isn't documented,
> /lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules appears to deal wi
On 25 March 2012 13:22, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
Taken to systemd-devel.
--
imalone
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
> a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
> response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
> Obviously things have moved on sin
Hi,
I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
Obviously things have moved on since I last looked at permissions and
their use with dev
