On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:04:53PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:45:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > > /etc/rpmins
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:45:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> >
> > So that is a global config file...
> > RFE: move
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
>
> So that is a global config file...
> RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> 99% of users should not modify t
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:49:42AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> What I have in progress right now is the ability to add filespecs using
> glob(3) syntax that you want to ignore per test. That gets configured put
> package (or if the vendor decides to configure it globally, sure) in a
> .rpminspe
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> > >
> > > So that is a global config file...
> > > RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> > > 99% of u
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> >
> > So that is a global config file...
> > RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> > 99% of users should not modify that, and it shouldn't be in /etc.
>
> I disagree. Use
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:49:42AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:54:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
/etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as t
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
> David Cantrell wrote:
>
> as I suspect this is an infra configuration problem with the
> s390x builders, I have just opened
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8731
> There is really somet
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:54:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
/etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as the value of the elf_ipv6_blacklist. That
looks like this in rpmi
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
> /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as the value of the elf_ipv6_blacklist. That
> looks like this in rpminspect-data-fedora:
>
> elf_ipv6_blacklist = "gethostbyname gethostby
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
>failure [1], and one of the fa
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
> >failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
> >fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
Wh
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed failure [1],
and one of the failing tests was
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2], whi
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
> failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
> fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
>
> When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2]
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
> failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
> fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
>
> When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2]
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed failure [1],
> and one of the failing tests was
> fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
>
> When I click on the label, I get redirected
Hi,
for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed failure [1],
and one of the failing tests was
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2], which is a long list
of stuff like "print message" and "shell script" and "ci noti
18 matches
Mail list logo
