Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:28:48PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place > > for > > systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in > > F25+. > > Ke

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > OK, so I think Michael is kind of making my point for me: > > If we have something called @standard whose purpose is essentially to > be a small > set of things we expect everyone to need... having one of our top- > tier > deliverables

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/04/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place >> for >> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in >> F25+. > > Keep in mind that Fedora

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place > for > systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in > F25+. Keep in mind that Fedora Workstation does NOT include @standard as it brings in som

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:20:34PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > (Also, going forward I'd love to see us build comps in a more sane manner than > by editing an XML file; this simply *screams* for having a decent web UI to > manage it, tied into pkgdb so when a package is retired it also disappe

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/04/2016 12:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group, > but I don't know where to move them to. > > systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be > part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin

comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

2016-04-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group, but I don't know where to move them to. systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin. It should not be installed in containers and chroots, e.g. mock. Is @st