On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 08:50:42PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Update: it's .. looking more complicated than I anticipated:
>
> The new ragel can in theory be built against the updated colm, *but*
> it expect colm to provide some *.la files (libtool archives), which...
> our packaging
Update: it's .. looking more complicated than I anticipated:
The new ragel can in theory be built against the updated colm, *but*
it expect colm to provide some *.la files (libtool archives), which...
our packaging guidelines require to be stripped out, and colm-devel
rightly does not ship.
I'm
thanks, next time I'll coordinate with the ragel update.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:45 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed when rebuilding mcrouter that it failed because ragel is not
> installable, because colm was updated:
>
> DEBUG util.py:443: Err
Hi,
I noticed when rebuilding mcrouter that it failed because ragel is not
installable, because colm was updated:
DEBUG util.py:443: Error:
DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:443:- nothing provides libcolm-0.13.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
ragel-7.0.0.12-9.fc38.x
