On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:39:38 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
...snip...
> Worker 0: File not
> found:
> /mnt/koji/toplink/packages/msitools/0.92/3.fc20/x86_64/libmsi1-0.92-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm
> Worker 0: File not
> found:
> /mnt/koji/toplink/packages/msitools/0.92/3.fc20/x86_64/msitools-0.92-3.fc20
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:57:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Yeah, the rawhide build just finished OK. Still would like to know
> > what happened the first time, though. If anyone wants to do a
> > postmortem, the failed build was here:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5212558
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:54:01 -0400
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> Somebody please fix?
>
> >> Well, fortunately this is only affecting rawhide, and I would hope
> >> nobody is storing critical data on rawhide ;-)
>
> > Sure, but I'd like to note that rawhide
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
Somebody please fix?
>> Well, fortunately this is only affecting rawhide, and I would hope
>> nobody is storing critical data on rawhide ;-)
> Sure, but I'd like to note that rawhide users are people too. ;)
> We should try and avoid the 'no one uses
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:49:52 -0400
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400,
> >> Somebody please fix?
>
> > Note that this is needed to rebuild postgresql to fix an important
> > security issue for which information how to exploit it are now
> > publ
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 00:53:25 +0900,
>Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>> So I guess repoclosure process is somewhat broken on koji.
> I just did a successful scratch build of postgres 9.2.4 on koji, so it
> might have been a temporary glitch and that another build try will
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 00:53:25 +0900,
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Note that on i686 building buildroot seemed successful (but was canceled due to
x86_64 side buildroot creating failure:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2571/5212571/root.log
task root:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koj
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 04/04/2013 11:41 PM +9:00:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:32:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: bison-2.7-1.fc20.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: m4 >= 1.4
DE
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400,
>> Somebody please fix?
> Note that this is needed to rebuild postgresql to fix an important security
> issue for which information how to exploit it are now public. It would be
> really nice to have this fixed today even if that
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:32:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400,
>Tom Lane wrote:
> >DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: bison-2.7-1.fc20.x86_64 (build)
> >DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: m4 >= 1.4
> >DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: flex-2.5.37-
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: bison-2.7-1.fc20.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: m4 >= 1.4
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: flex-2.5.37-1.fc20.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: m4
DEBUG
DEBUG util.py:264: Getting requirements for postgresql-9.2.4-1.fc20.src
DEBUG util.py:264: --> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.64-2.fc19.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264: --> Already installed : glibc-devel-2.17-5.fc20.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:264: --> bison-2.7-1.fc20.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:264: --> flex-2.5
12 matches
Mail list logo
