Re: arm/neon LTO-related FTBS

2020-08-06 Thread Dominique Martinet
Dominique Martinet wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020: > So I'd really need a way to have only that file compiled with the > optimisations, and other files without it -- Jeff or someone else, could > you please advise? I could still use help with that, please. To recap, waypipe: - compiles a single func

Re: arm/neon LTO-related FTBS

2020-08-04 Thread Dominique Martinet
Dominique Martinet wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020: > I would appreciate slightly less conflicting exchanges in the future; > I'm happy to do things differently if I'm pointed at problems but there > *is* a change of behaviour with LTO and that isn't wrong. > > I apprently proceeded to fix it in a way

Re: arm/neon LTO-related FTBS

2020-08-04 Thread Dominique Martinet
Peter Robinson wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020: > > The "fix" here is simple and upstream is reactive so I'll just resubmit > > the package with -mfpu=neon appended to linker args as well, but this > > might come bite other projects as well. > > NO! That is not the fix. We explicitly don't build with N

Re: arm/neon LTO-related FTBS

2020-08-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Hi, > > this is more of a head's up than a bug per se (well, I'm actually not > sure if it's a bug, is it?), but I've had a package fail to build due to > LTO and neon optimisations: > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2576/

arm/neon LTO-related FTBS

2020-08-03 Thread Dominique Martinet
Hi, this is more of a head's up than a bug per se (well, I'm actually not sure if it's a bug, is it?), but I've had a package fail to build due to LTO and neon optimisations: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2576/48362576/build.log Basically what they do is compile different .a with