Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > The short version of what you should do is, at a minimum, put a 48x48 > version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48 . It's really good > to put a .svg version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable > too, and what with GNOME using very large icons on its

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 09:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Kofler writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> * Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane 2.2.12-8 > >> - Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this > >> package has historically done; the former is considered correct. > >> > >> Digging

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-06 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Kofler writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> * Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane 2.2.12-8 >> - Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this >> package has historically done; the former is considered correct. >> >> Digging further, the reason I changed it is because Red Hat's rpmdiff >>

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Lane wrote: > Now I'm really confused, because I received the opposite advice a couple > of years ago, cf unixODBC.spec: > > * Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane 2.2.12-8 > - Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this > package has historically done; the former is considered corr

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Adam Williamson writes: > > On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote: > >> 1) Is putting the icon into /usr/share/pixmap OK? > > > Not really. That dir is obsolescent, effectively. I'm not sure if we'll > > ever manage to throw it

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-05 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Williamson writes: > On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote: >> 1) Is putting the icon into /usr/share/pixmap OK? > Not really. That dir is obsolescent, effectively. I'm not sure if we'll > ever manage to throw it away, but if you have the opportunity to control > icon deploy

Re: application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote: > I just learned in a package review about the requirement to update the > icon cache: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache > > I'm checking my other packages that have icons. I discovered that one >

application icon locations and cache update

2011-12-05 Thread Eric Smith
I just learned in a package review about the requirement to update the icon cache: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache I'm checking my other packages that have icons. I discovered that one of my packages installs its icon into /usr/share/pixmap, rather tha