Re: Zlib-ng rebase from 2.1.* to 2.2.* version

2024-10-03 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Fabio Valentini writes: > > For the record, I don't think a Change proposal for a relatively > "minor" (pun intended) update like is necessary. > But if you want to go through the Change Process (for example, to make > this change more visible / public), then that's fine too. We were unsure if th

Re: Zlib-ng rebase from 2.1.* to 2.2.* version

2024-10-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:26 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote: > > Hi, > > As part of the Zlib-ng Fedora Change [1] we're rebasing the Zlib-ng to a new > major release 2.2.*. > > This release brings quite a lot of new optimizations to the zlib-ng which > could be seen in the Fedora Change notes. > > Aft

Zlib-ng rebase from 2.1.* to 2.2.* version

2024-09-30 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Hi, As part of the Zlib-ng Fedora Change [1] we're rebasing the Zlib-ng to a new major release 2.2.*. This release brings quite a lot of new optimizations to the zlib-ng which could be seen in the Fedora Change notes. After the first reviews, I started to doubt if the change was even necessary f